Institutional influence and the role of family in poor women’s micropreneurship

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of how the institutions of family and culture play out in shaping family business practices. This study focusses on family business led by poor entrepreneurial women in a context of extreme poverty. Design/methodology/approach The methods included participant observation, focus groups and interviews in two poor villages in South-East Nigeria. Thematic analysis was used to develop insight about how the institutions of family and culture shape family business practices. Findings The analysis demonstrated that the family, with associated responsibilities and norms, is a powerful institution that determines women’s role and business behaviours. Poor entrepreneurial women depend on the family to run their business, but also use the business to sustain the family. They make use of their limited resources (e.g. time, money, skills) to meet families’ basic needs and pay for necessities such as children’s education. These are family priorities, rather than maximising profits. Research limitations/implications The study was limited to rural Africa, in particular to a small sample of rural women entrepreneurs in South-East Nigeria, and as such, the findings are not necessarily generalisable, but may be at a conceptual level. Practical implications The study has highlighted the need to tailor micro-enterprise development programmes that facilitate change, add values to entrepreneurial activities and support women to fulfil their roles and ease institutional pressures affecting rural women economic activities. In short, such programmes need to account for cultural institutions. Social implications This study presents insights of the influence of institutions (family and culture) in business led by rural Nigerian women. Originality/value This research fills a gap in the family business literature by offering conceptual insights about how the institutional obligations of family mean that micro-enterprising should be conceptualised as an entity, rather than as a family in business or the family business.

Are There Gender Differences in Sustainable Entrepreneurship Indicators Amongst SMEs in South Africa? Application of MANOVA

“…Our analysis agrees that there are significant combined effects of finance, social and environmental success factors on entrepreneurship ownership and management in terms of gender disparity in South Africa amongst male and female SME owners as per social index in South Africa. In their separate studies, Goyal andPartkash (2011), Tambunan (2017) and Yunis et al (2020) (Goyal & Parkash 2011, Kaunda & Nkhoma 2013, Xiong et al 2018and Matser et al 2020 and education (De Tienne & Chandler 2007, Mari et al 2016and Shava & Rungani 2016. All in all, these social factors have been shown empirically as having directly or indirectly influenced gender ownership and management of entrepreneurship activities of the SMEs.…”

Institutional influences on entrepreneurial behaviours in the family entrepreneurship context: towards an integrative framework

“…The collective contribution of this special issue As noted in Table II, the collection of papers featured in this special issue provides an intricate picture of the complex institutional elements and mechanisms in family entrepreneurship. Going beyond the dichotomous approaches embraced by previous research, Table II shows how different institutions complement and compete. We see, for instance, that national cultures permeate and are complemented by other elements and at other levels (reinforcement according to Scott, 2010 normative elements of a field relay this assumption of difference (Franco and Piceti, 2020) or cognitive-cultural elements on more micro-levels such as within the family reinforce them (Xiong et al, 2020). In collective cultures (or those self-perceived as such), the assumption of "we vs they" is relayed and reinforced on the family level, influencing, for example, which resources are shared and how (Estrada-Robles et al, 2020), and permeates the family firm to influence the process of legitimacy acquisition by the successor (Wasim et al, 2020).…”

“…Institutional influence and the role of family in poor women's micropreneurship. Rather than seeing the family as resource for the business or the business as resource for the family, to understand micropreneurship of resource-constrained women in rural Nigeria, Xiong et al (2020) use the business family as a socio-economic unit of both production and consumption. In other terms, the family is the micro-entrepreneurial unit.…”

“…produce to sell, feed for their poultry activity, financial resources, etc.). Xiong et al (2020) argue that the informal institutions (specifically that the husband is head of the household and holds the power to inhibit the woman's actions) that dictate the rules of these microentrepreneurs constrain their entrepreneurship, whereas it can also be seen as facilitating in that it allows for short-term but not longer-term goals. This study offers a reminder of the distinction between income entrepreneurship and growth-oriented entrepreneurship as well as the link to the difference between income vs growth and necessity vs opportunity.…”

Economic assessment of the Igbo entrepreneurship model for entrepreneurial development in Nigeria: evidence from clusters in Anambra state

“…The link between entrepreneurship and favourable economic outcomes is well acknowledged (Vracheva and Stoyneva, 2020; Xiong et al , 2018). This nexus largely guarantees a collaborative environment for the advantageous association among relevant actors in the business ecosystem of an economy.…”