2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:requ.0000037061.19745.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Herding in the ADR Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research using a different approach than ours suggest that institutions may also herd for reasons other than information (see, e.g., Grinblatt et al 1995;Li and Yung 2004;Sias 2004;Sharma et al 2004). Bikhchandani and Sharma (2000) suggest three reasons for institutional herding.…”
Section: Measuring Speculative Intensitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other research using a different approach than ours suggest that institutions may also herd for reasons other than information (see, e.g., Grinblatt et al 1995;Li and Yung 2004;Sias 2004;Sharma et al 2004). Bikhchandani and Sharma (2000) suggest three reasons for institutional herding.…”
Section: Measuring Speculative Intensitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…International herding papers in a single market setting include studies of: Japan (Kim and Nofsinger, 2005); Korea (Choe et al, 1999;Kim and Wei, 2002); Taiwan (Chen and Hong, 2006); Israel (Venezia et al, 2011); Germany (Walter and Weber, 2006;Kremer and Nautz, 2013); the United Kingdom (Wylie, 2005); Portugal (Lobao and Serra, 2007); Poland (Voronkova and Bohl, 2005); India (Lakshman et al, 2013); Hong Kong (Zhou and Lai, 2009). In addition, Li and Yung (2004) study herding in American Depository Receipts. Most of the non-US studies above examine herding behavior in great detail by employing high frequency holdings data.…”
Section: International Evidence Of Institutional Herdingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In view of the above motives underlying institutional herding, the possibility of fund managers imitating each other in their trades has been extensively researched during the past two decades with evidence from a large array of long-established developed and emerging markets -including the US (Li and Yung, 2004;Sias, 2004;Choi and Sias, 2009;Liao et al, 2011), Germany (Walter and Weber, 2006;Kremer and Nautz, 2013), South Korea (Choe et al, 1999;Kim and Wei, 2002a;2002b) and Taiwan (Hung et al, 2010;Lu et al, 2012) -suggesting that investment professionals exhibit significant mimicry in their trading behaviour. However, no evidence has as yet been reported regarding institutional herding for the specific subset of markets known as frontier markets, despite the increased attention they have been receiving recently from professional investors (De Groot et al, 2012).…”
Section: Institutional Herding and Its Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%