2017
DOI: 10.1108/s1042-319220170000015006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Ethnography and Actor-Network Theory: In Dialogue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the analysis undertaken below is more ethnomethodological in focus as it is concerned with how the work setting is ordered and accomplished (Rawls, 2008) and the different "common sense" methods paramedics use to order their everyday lives (Watson, 2012). Nevertheless, as I discuss elsewhere, this ethnomethodological focus aligns with, and is key to, IEs "ontological shift" (Corman & Barron, 2017;Corman, 2017b); not only does it shed light on the work processes of front line workers and what counts for them, but such descriptive accounts are also essential in providing a "clearer picture of 'how it works'"; how work and work settings are organized are a central concern in IE (DeVault, 2008, p. 9). Nevertheless, and because of this ethnomethodological focus, I leave for a more explicit discussion elsewhere of how the work of paramedics is shaped by "institutional relations" (see Corman, 2017a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that the analysis undertaken below is more ethnomethodological in focus as it is concerned with how the work setting is ordered and accomplished (Rawls, 2008) and the different "common sense" methods paramedics use to order their everyday lives (Watson, 2012). Nevertheless, as I discuss elsewhere, this ethnomethodological focus aligns with, and is key to, IEs "ontological shift" (Corman & Barron, 2017;Corman, 2017b); not only does it shed light on the work processes of front line workers and what counts for them, but such descriptive accounts are also essential in providing a "clearer picture of 'how it works'"; how work and work settings are organized are a central concern in IE (DeVault, 2008, p. 9). Nevertheless, and because of this ethnomethodological focus, I leave for a more explicit discussion elsewhere of how the work of paramedics is shaped by "institutional relations" (see Corman, 2017a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional ethnography (IE) is a sociology that focuses on what people do and how people's everyday lives are organized by, what Smith (2005) calls, extra-local relations of ruling. As a theory/method, IE draws on the likes of Garfinkel, Marx, Mead, Foucault, Bahktin, and Volosinov to proffer a social ontology that views the world as "being produced and brought into being through the social practices of people" (G. Smith, 2006, p. 34; see Corman & Barron, 2017) and a reflexive epistemology that moves away from traditionally objectivist accounts of knowledge toward viewing knowledge as "being mutually produced through interaction between researchers and the people they learn from" (p. 31). As a project of discovery, institutional ethnographers aim to explore people's work processes, generously conceived, 3 and how their work is organized and coordinated by textmediated and text-regulated social organization.…”
Section: Institutional Ethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a theory/method of discovery, it explores people's work processes, generously conceived, and how their work is organized and coordinated by text‐mediated social organization. With roots in the feminist movement, Marx, Garfinkel, Mead, Foucault, Bahktin and Volosinov (see Corman and Barron ; Smith ), IE proffers a social ontology that views the world as “being produced and brought into being through the social practices of people” (Frampton et al :34) and a reflexive epistemology that moves away from traditionally objectivist accounts of knowledge towards viewing knowledge as “being mutually produced through interaction between researchers and the people they learn from” (p. 31). By exploring what people do and how what they do is organized by text‐mediated modes of social organization, the analytical goal of IE is to explicate “how things work” or are “put together” in a setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, in focusing on the “taken‐for‐granted” work and how order in this work setting is produced or accomplished (Rawls ), the analysis that follows could be thought of as more ethnomethodological because it focuses more on the “‘common sense’ methods that members use to solve problems, make decisions, make sense of their situations and undertake fact finding in their everyday lives'” (Watson :55). Nevertheless, this more analytically descriptive focus is part of institutional ethnography's project of discovery; ethnomethodology is a key part of institutional ethnography's “ontological shift” (see Corman and Barron ) and, as DeVault (:9) notes, “Simply accounting for all of the work of the setting often provides a much clearer picture of ‘how it works’.”…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the focus remains on describing the stabilities and uncertainties of the interactions that make up a "flat" assemblage. This methodological shortcoming is particularly pronounced in analyses that take place in settings where power (both the power to take action as a subject and the power to prevent the actions of other subjects) can be glaringly unequal, such as occurs in a tertiary care hospital or a university (Corman and Barron 2017).…”
Section: Table 1 Components Of An Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%