2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-47945-9_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Environment of the Digital Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutions reflect a person's ideas about the surrounding reality and a person's ideas about his place in this reality. Institutions evolve in an inextricable connection with technology (Sazanova & Kuznetsov, 2020), public consciousness and organizations. People create organizations for personal and / or collective results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutions reflect a person's ideas about the surrounding reality and a person's ideas about his place in this reality. Institutions evolve in an inextricable connection with technology (Sazanova & Kuznetsov, 2020), public consciousness and organizations. People create organizations for personal and / or collective results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, EIIS barriers of SCD were identified and shortlisted from literature based on the opinion of experts in industry and academia, with a specific focus on electronics SC. The digitalization process faces major challenges: lack of required skill set and professionals (Primak et al, 2018), integration issues with existing and new technologies and lack of proper communication in the organization (Sazanova and Kuznetsov, 2019). The major EIIS adoption barriers observed are lack of information technology, information sharing, trust, demand distortion-bullwhip, system incompatibility, lack of knowledge and cost of integration.…”
Section: Eiis Barriers For Scdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В отличие от неоклассической и кейнсианской теорий, переживших конвергенцию с последующим формированием синтезированной теории (кейнсианско-неоклассический синтез), институциональная теория находится в настоящее время в состоянии дивергенции. Ее направления существенно различаются методологически и теоретически (Тамбовцев, 2021a, 2021b) и тяготеют в большей степени к междисциплинарному, чем к внутридисциплинарному, сотрудничеству (Sazanova, Kuznetsov, 2020). Неоинституциональная теория, основанная на методологическом атомизме (экономическом индивидуализме), в большей степени кооперируется с математикой, а институционально-эволюционная теория, основанная на методологическом холизме (экономическом коллективизме), кооперируется с биологией и психологией.…”
unclassified