2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2010.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional distance and the internationalization process: The case of mobile operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the three pillars have been clearly distinguished theoretically, in practice researchers may combine some of them, particularly the normative and the cognitive-cultural ones, or omit one of them altogether (Pogrebnyakov and Maitland 2011). Institutional distance has also to a large degree incorporated and superseded the popular liability of foreignness framework, which postulates that new entrants into a market are disadvantaged compared to similar local players due to their unfamiliarity with the local environment (Denk et al 2012).…”
Section: Distance-dependent Explanations Of Internationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the three pillars have been clearly distinguished theoretically, in practice researchers may combine some of them, particularly the normative and the cognitive-cultural ones, or omit one of them altogether (Pogrebnyakov and Maitland 2011). Institutional distance has also to a large degree incorporated and superseded the popular liability of foreignness framework, which postulates that new entrants into a market are disadvantaged compared to similar local players due to their unfamiliarity with the local environment (Denk et al 2012).…”
Section: Distance-dependent Explanations Of Internationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulatory component of institutional distance was calculated from the World Bank's Worldwide Governance Indicators (World Bank 2016), Government Effectiveness component, which reflects country regulations (Kirkpatrick et al 2006). The cognitive-cultural component of institutional distance was calculated using data on languages and religious affiliation (Pogrebnyakov and Maitland 2011;De Groot et al 2004). Other techniques, such as Hofstede's (1980) cultural dimensions, do not provide sufficient coverage for the countries in this dataset.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional distance was also found to be a significant factor when businesses chose a host country for internationalization. In general, evidence support the fact that companies tend to choose host countries for foreign entry which exhibit smaller institutional distance vs. countries which exhibit larger institutional distance [15] [16].…”
Section: The Uppsala Internationalization Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As part of this, the time at which operators enter a particular market has also been examined (see, for instance, Sung, 2014;Whalley and Curwen, 2012b), as has the organisational structures through which internationalisation is undertaken (see, for example, Luiz and Stephan, 2012;Sutherland, 2014;Curwen, 2012b, 2013). How the structure of markets influences internationalisation and the success of operators has also been addressed (see, for example, Pogrebynakov and Maitland, 2011;Sarkar et al, 1999).…”
Section: Measuring Internationalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%