2003
DOI: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional design for community economic development models: Issues of opportunity and capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attention to capacity building accounts for much of the growth in the rural economic development literature during the past 10 years (Kenny 2002). It has attracted attention because of the central importance it plays in equipping communities to ‘identify, enhance, and mobilize its human potential, economic opportunities, social relationships, and ecological resources for the purpose of improved community stability’ (McCall 2003, 101). Research documenting the shifting emphasis from a comparative to a competitive advantage approach to rural economies emphasizes the importance of intangible assets, notably human and social capital, as the key to local capacity building.…”
Section: Building Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention to capacity building accounts for much of the growth in the rural economic development literature during the past 10 years (Kenny 2002). It has attracted attention because of the central importance it plays in equipping communities to ‘identify, enhance, and mobilize its human potential, economic opportunities, social relationships, and ecological resources for the purpose of improved community stability’ (McCall 2003, 101). Research documenting the shifting emphasis from a comparative to a competitive advantage approach to rural economies emphasizes the importance of intangible assets, notably human and social capital, as the key to local capacity building.…”
Section: Building Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation for examining social enterprises in regional Australia was that while the social economy is gaining greater credence from state governments in Australia, there is scant evidence of the social economy's role and contribution within the context of regional development, particularly that of social enterprises. Unlike Canada (McCall 2003) and some countries in Europe (Borzaga and Tortia 2009) where there is much greater attention to the role of the social economy in regional development initiatives, the challenges that regional Australia faces have not been widely explored or documented in terms of the social economy's potential contribution. The social economy in this case involved both Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian social enterprise and therefore a decolonizing methodological approach was necessary.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives -Institutional Logics and The Sociamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the globalization era, local communities and regions are called on to play a front line role in mobilizing internal and external assets to establish economic development initiatives from the bottom-up (Robinson, 1995;Babacan and Gopalkrishnan, 2001;Leeming, 2002;McCall, 2003). This is what Kretzmann and McNight (1993) called 'asset-based community development'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%