Institutional Contributions to the Leading Finance Journals, 1975 Through 1986: A Note

Niemi, Albert W.

doi:10.2307/2328535

Cited by 31 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Objective measurement studies have used metrics based on the number of publications by finance researchers (Klemkosky and Tuttle, 1977ab); the number of papers published by researchers and institutions in leading journals (Schweser, 1977;Niemi, 1987;Heck et al, 1986;Heck and Cooley, 1988); the distribution of contributors to top journals (Chung and Cox, 1990;Cox and Chung, 1991); and publication rates by doctoral graduates over time (Zivney and Bertin, 1992). Later studies tend to use citation measures based upon the argument that the number of publications measure scholarly output while the number of citations received is more reflective of scholarly impact (Alexander and Mabry, 1994;Borokhovich et al, 1995Borokhovich et al, , 2000Chung et al, 2001;Chan et al, 2002;Borokhovich et al, 2011).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology

Currie

Pandher

2011

Journal of Banking & Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology

Currie

Pandher

2011

Journal of Banking & Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The study of journals is therefore an important area of research, both in specific disciplines and in the sociology of science and scientometrics (Adler & Harzing, 2009). Journals are examined and assessed for their relevance or influence within a particular discipline, with the purpose of guiding researchers on where to publish or in order to assess the contribution of researchers and institutions based on the journals they publish (see, for example, García, Rodríguez-Sánchez, & Fernández-Valdivia, 2012;or Harzing & Mijndhardt, 2015;Niemi, 1987Niemi, , 1988.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Expert Judgments to Rank 45 Latin American Business Journals

Olavarrieta

2016

Rev. adm. empres.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents the results of a study on the perception of quality of Latin American business journals based on the judgment of relevant experts -senior professors with knowledge of Latin American research and journals. Forty-five journals were included in the study. The highest perceived quality scores were given to Academia (CLADEA -Uniandes), RAE (Fundação Getulio Vargas), and Innovar (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). When perceived quality was weighted by awareness, Academia, LABR-Latin American Business Review (University of San Diego -Coppead), and Innovar had the highest scores. Results complement a recent study by Ruiz-Torres, Penkova, and Villafane (2012) that focused on management journals published in Spanish. Analysis of results suggests that language and branding have an effect on the perception of journal quality. Implications for editors/ publishers, tenure, promotion, research grant committees, and authors are provided.KEYWORDS | Scientifics journals, ranking, Latin America, scientific production, business research. RESUMO RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas | FGV/EAESP

show abstract

“…More recently Borokhovich et al (1995) find that 10% of 661 academic institutions account for two-thirds of the articles in 16 finance journals during a 5-year period. Similarly high concentrations of finance research among institutions employing authors in three leading finance journals is found by Niemi (1987). Chan et al (2002) report that North American institutions dominate the finance literature, although European and Asian institutions are gaining ground.…”

mentioning

confidence: 76%