2008
DOI: 10.1080/13538320802054524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Audits: A Comparison of the Experiences of Three South African Universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, the lack of leadership commitment might be one of the reasons why the leadership did not assign a large number of staff to participate in the process as well as not focus on enhancing the coordination among the staff and units in implementing self-study. These findings confirmed the view that the success of EQA depends on the extent to which the key internal constituencies 'buy into' the processes and become committed to the outcomes of the processes (see Botha, 2008;Jones & Saram, 2005).…”
Section: Perceived Problems and Challenges Associated With Accreditationsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arguably, the lack of leadership commitment might be one of the reasons why the leadership did not assign a large number of staff to participate in the process as well as not focus on enhancing the coordination among the staff and units in implementing self-study. These findings confirmed the view that the success of EQA depends on the extent to which the key internal constituencies 'buy into' the processes and become committed to the outcomes of the processes (see Botha, 2008;Jones & Saram, 2005).…”
Section: Perceived Problems and Challenges Associated With Accreditationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Stensaker (2003) revealed criticisms of academics towards the rigidity of assessors that made them feel as though they were being inspected. More recently, Botha (2008) reported the doubts of institutional staff regarding the value of the QAA site visits.…”
Section: Perceived Problems and Challenges Associated With Accreditationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section is based on four main sources of evidence: (a) HEQCcommissioned research; (b) research conducted by institutional managers who were interested in the impact of audits in their own institutions (Botha et al, 2008) and research interest in the impact of audits more generally (Luckett, 2007;Quinn and Boughey, 2009); (c) investigations undertaken as part of the external evaluation of the HEQC; and (d) an analysis of selected improvement plans submitted to the HEQC by the audited institutions.…”
Section: External Institutional Audits: Outcomes and Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted by senior staff responsible for quality assurance at three South African institutions that were audited between 2005 and 2006 shows that the HEQC audit reports kept a balance between recommendations on issues commonly found in other audit systems and recommendations that specifically referred to South Africa's concern with fitness of purpose and transformation in the post-apartheid dispensation, such as issues of equity and redress relating to students and staff (Botha et al, 2008). We have argued elsewhere that the complex conceptualisation of quality developed by the HEQC for the period in which it started its work meant that issues of transformation could not be separated from issues of quality (Lange and Singh, 2010;Singh, 2011b).…”
Section: Review Of the Approach To And Pace Of Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other institutions, quality departments are in the process of being established, as at Ahmadu Bello University in Nigeria (Müller et al 2012). However, there are still cases in which self-assessment is undertaken by ad-hoc committees, like at Bahir Dar University in Ethiopia (Adamu and Adamu, 2012) and at the University of Cape Town, Rhodes University, and Stellenbosch University in South Africa (Botha et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%