Institutional approaches to academic program evaluation

Munitz, Barry; Wright, Douglas J.

doi:10.1002/ir.37019802704

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

) •1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1983

2000

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…University of Houston (Munitz & Wright, 1980) studies, and countless other similar or related studies, this present study focuses exclusively on the needs and levels of student satisfaction based upon "market driven model." This fact places this study in a small minority.…”

Section: ) •mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Assessment of the Adequacy of the Services of an Urban Public University for International and U.S. Students: a Comparative Study

Pioquinto¹

2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: ) •mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Assessment of the Adequacy of the Services of an Urban Public University for International and U.S. Students: a Comparative Study

Pioquinto¹

2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Conduct and Neglect of Self-Studies in Medical Education

McArtor

Kliot

1990

Eval Health Prof

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

All Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) accredited medical schools were surveyed to evaluate 12 aspects of selfstudies employed in medical education; we obtained a 71% response rate. The survey instrument offered responses from a list of alternatives, ratings on Likert-like scales, and openended comments. The majority of schools are engaged in self-study to meet accreditation needs or administrative mandate. Fewer than half of the respondents had performed evaluation of departments or courses during the two years preceding this survey. Few respondents identified a model or process of evaluation practice that guides their work, and there was little evidence that they have taken advantage of recent developments in evaluation theory and practice. Externally developed methodology and external expert review were used much less frequently than internally developed instruments or LCME guidelines. Only half of the respondents reported that results of self-studies were discussed with the school leadership. Schools of medicine may benefit by redirecting resources committed to institutional self-study to developing more appropriate evaluation practices for medical education.

show abstract

Critical Issues in Program Evaluation

Wilson¹

1984

The Review of Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutional approaches to academic program evaluation

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

An Assessment of the Adequacy of the Services of an Urban Public University for International and U.S. Students: a Comparative Study

An Assessment of the Adequacy of the Services of an Urban Public University for International and U.S. Students: a Comparative Study

The Conduct and Neglect of Self-Studies in Medical Education

Critical Issues in Program Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About