1995
DOI: 10.1006/jema.1995.0064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional and Landowner Perspectives on Wetland Management in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with similar findings elsewhere (Jones et al 1995) greater stakes in terms of land owned in Kabartal led to a more resentful attitude, as seen from the positive correlation between Kabartal landholding (Land_Kabar) with React_land (r = 0.497, P < 0.01) (Annexure I).…”
Section: Socio-economic and Attitude Correlationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with similar findings elsewhere (Jones et al 1995) greater stakes in terms of land owned in Kabartal led to a more resentful attitude, as seen from the positive correlation between Kabartal landholding (Land_Kabar) with React_land (r = 0.497, P < 0.01) (Annexure I).…”
Section: Socio-economic and Attitude Correlationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…But, as is consistent with the strong utilitarian attitudes of farmers elsewhere (Jones et al 1995;Wilson 1992), their concern did not extend to the wetland on their own properties and a strong conflict existed between the people and management with regard to land ownership and rights. With a few exceptions, however, extremely hostile and antagonistic behavior was not observed and people in general were willing to cooperate with the government and the forest department for better management of the wetland.…”
Section: Attitude and Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similar results were reported in other surveys, showing the importance of these factors for the public. For example, Jones et al (1995) describe a survey carried out among stakeholders and inhabitants in Franklin District's wetlands, New Zealand. The results revealed that species habitats, water quality and natural heritage were the most important assets of the wetlands.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the same time wetland has been dramatically destroyed with the development of human society. Wetland area decreasing, ecological function deteriorating and biodiversity reducing have produced a series of adverse environmental effects, e.g., frequent flood disaster and serious losing of water and soil (Herath, 2004;Hook, 1993;Jones et al, 1995;SFA et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%