New Themes in Institutional Analysis 2017
DOI: 10.4337/9781784716875.00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional analysis in a digital era: mechanisms and methods to understand emerging fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding fields, we concur with Powell et al (2017) that "a conceptual transition alone, however, does not suffice. We need new methods to accommodate a wider focus, which requires asking how to identify the members of nascent fields".…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding fields, we concur with Powell et al (2017) that "a conceptual transition alone, however, does not suffice. We need new methods to accommodate a wider focus, which requires asking how to identify the members of nascent fields".…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…To test the merits of this method, we use it to explore the issue field of 'social impact' in the US context, studied recently by Powell et al (2017).…”
Section: Gauging the Methodology: A Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With websites being increasingly a primary vehicle for communication with key audiences (e.g., Powell, Oberg, Korff, & Kloos, 2017), as well as for identity construction (e.g., Brown, 2006;Sillince & Brown, 2009), we expect this medium to document and record relationships between the city and its constituencies.…”
Section: Data Sources Sampling and Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%