2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13222-015-0204-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instant recovery with write-ahead logging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WBL also does not require an WALstyle undo phase. Instead, the DBMS only tracks the transactions active in the current group commit interval as determined by the analysis phase, so that it can ignore the effects of the associated uncommitted transactions [15,44,46]. In case of a transaction failure, the transaction manager rolls back any dirty changes flushed to NVM using the meta-data that it records in the dirty tuple table.…”
Section: Logging and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WBL also does not require an WALstyle undo phase. Instead, the DBMS only tracks the transactions active in the current group commit interval as determined by the analysis phase, so that it can ignore the effects of the associated uncommitted transactions [15,44,46]. In case of a transaction failure, the transaction manager rolls back any dirty changes flushed to NVM using the meta-data that it records in the dirty tuple table.…”
Section: Logging and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%