2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.recote.2011.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instability of total hip arthroplasty: An approach using the scientific evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Described by Scifert et al [16], the first two are caused by impingement (no impingement was seen in our patient). The third one is spontaneous separation (as in our case) but Fernández-Fairen et al [17] identified no spontaneous dislocation with a 32mm head.…”
Section: Figure 14: the Three Modes Of Dislocationmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Described by Scifert et al [16], the first two are caused by impingement (no impingement was seen in our patient). The third one is spontaneous separation (as in our case) but Fernández-Fairen et al [17] identified no spontaneous dislocation with a 32mm head.…”
Section: Figure 14: the Three Modes Of Dislocationmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Trying to fix the offset and the anteversion, we inadvertently increased the iliopsoas tension and, although passive dislocation was not possible, the tendon, under certain conditions (flexion-external rotation) could actively pull the head anteriorly and out of the cup, as in the spontaneous separation mode of dislocation as described by Scifert et al [16]. However, Fernández-Fairen et al [17] identified no spontaneous dislocation with a 32mm head but only with impingement, predominantly bony (Figure 14). We believe that even if no dislocation occurred, the concentration of those forces could eventually lead to cup wear and/or loosening in a few years.…”
Section: Acetabular Anteversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 La luxación se establece como pérdida completa de contacto entre los componentes de la superficie articular. 13 Se considera necesario el tratamiento quirúrgico de revisión luego del segundo o tercer episodio de luxación en ausencia de mal posicionamiento evidente de los componentes, en sujetos con reducción cerrada fallida y en presencia de desplazamiento significativo del trocánter mayor. 14 El aflojamiento séptico/infección se diagnostica por la presencia de al menos uno de los siguientes hallazgos: inflamación aguda detectada en estudio histopatológico de tejido periprotésico; tracto sinusal que se comunica con la prótesis; presencia de purulencia en el espacio articular; aislamiento de un mismo microorganismo en dos o más punciones articulares o muestras de tejido intraoperatorias; aislamiento de un microorganismo en cantidades sustanciales (≥ 20 unidades formadoras de colonias por cada 10 ml en volumen de 400 ml), o ambas.…”
Section: Iniciounclassified