2021
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instability and transition in the boundary layer driven by a rotating slender cone

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If distributed roughness elements are imposed on the surface for a rotating cone, the stationary mode is usually observed experimentally; see for example Corke & Knastak (1998) and Kato et al (2019a). However, if the surface is rather smooth, the background noise may enhance the excitation of the travelling modes, as observed by Corke & Knastak (1998) and Kato et al (2021). This argument is also true for the analysis of the centrifugal mode to be illustrated in the next subsection.…”
Section: Cross-flow Modementioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If distributed roughness elements are imposed on the surface for a rotating cone, the stationary mode is usually observed experimentally; see for example Corke & Knastak (1998) and Kato et al (2019a). However, if the surface is rather smooth, the background noise may enhance the excitation of the travelling modes, as observed by Corke & Knastak (1998) and Kato et al (2021). This argument is also true for the analysis of the centrifugal mode to be illustrated in the next subsection.…”
Section: Cross-flow Modementioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, if the surface is rather smooth, the background noise may enhance the excitation of the travelling modes, as observed by Corke & Knastak (1998) and Kato et al. (2021). This argument is also true for the analysis of the centrifugal mode to be illustrated in the next subsection.…”
Section: The Linear Instability Of a Rotating-cone Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, an alternative instability mechanism may be at work when the half-apex angle is smaller than about 40 • , meaning that the two categories, broad and slender (or sharp) cones, have distinctly different stability characteristics. Such a difference has also been observed in several experiments (Tien and Campbell, 1963;Kobayashi and Izumi, 1983;Kato et al, 2021aKato et al, , 2021b and also studied through linear stability analysis (Garrett et al, 2009;Hussain et al, 2014). The difference between broad and slender cones has been suggested to be that below some cone angle (ψ ≲ 40 • ) centrifugal effects dominate the flow in the boundary layer setting up a centrifugal instability similar to a Görtler instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%