1985
DOI: 10.1364/josab.2.000173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instabilities in lasers with an injected signal

Abstract: We consider a laser with an injected signal, in which the polarization can be adiabatically eliminated, we study the stability of the steady-state solutions, and we discuss the time-dependent solutions. For the laser alone, the only possible solution is constant intensity. However, the introduction of an external field, with an amplitude that does not satisfy the injection-locking condition, destabilizes the system. In such a case, numerical results show the existence of a self-Q-switching process, which induc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the frequency of the injected signal is too large, the beating between the external and cavity fields can induce nonlinear oscillations [TRE85] as well as deterministic chaos [SIM94a], multi-stability [GAV97], or excitability close to the boundary of phase-locking [GOU07]. Apart from their scientific appeal, these nonlinear dynamics can also be exploited and used for technological applications.…”
Section: Quantum-dot Laser Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the frequency of the injected signal is too large, the beating between the external and cavity fields can induce nonlinear oscillations [TRE85] as well as deterministic chaos [SIM94a], multi-stability [GAV97], or excitability close to the boundary of phase-locking [GOU07]. Apart from their scientific appeal, these nonlinear dynamics can also be exploited and used for technological applications.…”
Section: Quantum-dot Laser Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so we make direct numerical integrations of the SFM model using the following parameters (notations are identical to the one used by Martin-Regalado et al 36 ): amplitude anisotropy  a = −0.7 ns -1 , phase anisotropy  p = 4 ns -1 , linewidth enhancement factor  = 3, spinflip processes decay rate  s = 100 ns -1 , decay rate of the electric field in the cavity  = 600 ns -1 , decay rate of the total carrier number  = 1 ns -1 and normalized injection current  in [1,10]. We use a classic 4-stage Runge Kutta algorithm with a time step of 1 ps.…”
Section: Route To Polarization Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, so-called class A (ex: He-Ne, Ar and Dye), class B (ex: Nd:YAG, CO2 and semiconductor) or class C (ex: NH3) lasers have dynamics governed either by a single equation for the field, two equations for the field and population inversion or the full set of equations, respectively. In class A or class B laser systems chaos cannot be observed unless one adds one or several independent control parameters 10 . Chaos has then been reported in, for example, free-running NH3 lasers 11 , He-Ne lasers with modulation of the external field 12 , CO2 lasers with loss modulation 13 , solid-state laser with gain modulation 14 ,injected field 15 or global multimode coupling 16 , diode lasers with optical feedback 17 , saturable absorption 18 , or optical injection 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semiconductor lasers are dynamically class B lasers which do not require consideration of the polarization [3], [24]. The dynamical behavior is fully described by the temporal evolution of the complex optical field and the charge carrier density.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%