2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inspired by the past and looking to the future of the Stroop effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stroop task (Stroop, 1935) is one of the most investigated tasks to measure cognitive control. In the commonly used Stroop task (Henik, Bugg, & Goldfarb, 2018;MacLeod, 1991), participants are presented with a color word in color and asked to respond to the ink color and ignore the meaning of the word. The ink color and meaning of the word can be either congruent (e.g., RED written in red), incongruent (e.g., BLUE written in red), or neutral (e.g., XXXX written in red).…”
Section: Stroop Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stroop task (Stroop, 1935) is one of the most investigated tasks to measure cognitive control. In the commonly used Stroop task (Henik, Bugg, & Goldfarb, 2018;MacLeod, 1991), participants are presented with a color word in color and asked to respond to the ink color and ignore the meaning of the word. The ink color and meaning of the word can be either congruent (e.g., RED written in red), incongruent (e.g., BLUE written in red), or neutral (e.g., XXXX written in red).…”
Section: Stroop Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stroop task (Henik et al, 2018; Parris et al, 2019) is one of the most frequently used tasks to examine cognitive control. It examines the ability to focus on relevant information and ignore irrelevant information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It examines the ability to focus on relevant information and ignore irrelevant information. Specifically, in the commonly used colour-word Stroop task (Henik et al, 2018), participants are presented with coloured stimuli and are required to name the ink colour. The ink colour could be congruent with the meaning of the word (e.g., the word RED written in red ink) or incongruent with the meaning of the word (e.g., the word BLUE written in red ink).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it has been employed to examine the ability to focus on relevant information while ignoring irrelevant information. In the commonly used Stroop task (Henik et al, 2018 ), participants are presented with a color word printed in color and are asked to respond to the ink color and ignore the meaning of the word. The ink color and meaning of the word can be either congruent (e.g., “Blue” written in blue), incongruent (e.g., “Red” written in blue), or neutral (e.g., “a string of 4 Xs” written in blue; see, e.g., Henik et al, 2018 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the commonly used Stroop task (Henik et al, 2018 ), participants are presented with a color word printed in color and are asked to respond to the ink color and ignore the meaning of the word. The ink color and meaning of the word can be either congruent (e.g., “Blue” written in blue), incongruent (e.g., “Red” written in blue), or neutral (e.g., “a string of 4 Xs” written in blue; see, e.g., Henik et al, 2018 ). The difference in reaction time (RT) between incongruent and neutral stimuli (i.e., the interference effect) is large and reliable, whereas the difference between neutral and congruent stimuli (i.e., the facilitation effect) is small and fragile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%