Inspection of two sophisticated models for sand based on generalized plasticity: Monotonic loading and Monte Carlo analysis

Abstract

The generalized plasticity theory has evolved in the last decades and attracts the attention of different research groups, because of characteristics like the absence of an explicit flow surface formulation. This paper presents a detailed inspection of two sophisticated constitutive models for granular soils under monotonic loading: the Pastor‐Zienkiewicz‐Chan (P‐Z‐C) model[1] and the Manzanal‐Merodo‐Pastor (M‐M‐P) model.[2] Even though they are similar in mathematical framework, the P‐Z‐C model requires only eight parameters compared to the M‐M‐P model which requires 18 parameters to describe the material behavior under monotonic loading. Parameters of both models were calibrated based on the extensive experimental database available for monotonic triaxial tests performed on Karlsruhe fine sand by Wichtmann et al.[3] An objective discussion addressing the strengths and weaknesses of each model is presented. Finally, a procedure to identify the most relevant parameters that control different elements in the model like the stiffness, the evolution of dilatancy or the hardening variables is introduced, using the Monte Carlo Toolbox (MCAT) for simulations. Some interesting inferences could be obtained, like the conclusion that the MCAT is a helpful tool for identifying material parameters and their interaction, but it cannot replace the human factor, the experience and objective judgement of the modeller for the calibration of constitutive models.

New perspectives on preshearing history in granular soils

“…Input parameters for KFS were already determined based on a detailed investigation of existing and well-documented laboratory experiments e.g. [41][42][43] . As representatives of the advanced and at the same time (comparatively) widely used material models, the hypoplasticity 44 with intergranular strain 45 (Hypo+IGS), the intergranular strain anisotropy model (ISA) 46 , and the elastoplastic model SaniSand 47 are considered.…”