2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inspection and Risk Assessment of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Supporting Bridge Abutments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected sites, which were natural slopes, previously suffered from shallow slope instabilities, have been rectified using hybrid mitigation measures involving geosynthetically reinforced soil (GRS) wall and bio-slope stabilization. Failures of some GRS walls due to soil erosion in the toe area has been reported in the literature [29]. Vetiver grass system has thus been used to improve slope stability and reduce soil erosion below the toe of GRS wall in these studied sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The selected sites, which were natural slopes, previously suffered from shallow slope instabilities, have been rectified using hybrid mitigation measures involving geosynthetically reinforced soil (GRS) wall and bio-slope stabilization. Failures of some GRS walls due to soil erosion in the toe area has been reported in the literature [29]. Vetiver grass system has thus been used to improve slope stability and reduce soil erosion below the toe of GRS wall in these studied sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Tatsuoka et al [47] reported a practical case where the toe of a geosynthetic railway embankment in the mountains of Kyushu, Japan experienced strong scour and erosion caused by flooding. Tarawneh et al [48] reported that about 13% of 339 reinforced soil walls supporting bridge abutments inspected in the state of Ohio, USA experienced soil erosion at the wall toe. In these extreme cases, the shear strength of the interfaces at the wall toe must have reduced sharply, resulting in a significant decrease in the toe resistance.…”
Section: Influence Factors Of the Toe Load Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%