2007
DOI: 10.1258/rsmmsl.47.3.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insomnia in places of detention: a review of the most recent research findings

Abstract: Up to 40% of prisoner patients in a general medicine outpatient service seek medical consultation for sleep problems. This paper provides a brief overview of what is known about insomnia and its treatment from studies on non-detained patients and discusses the relevance of the findings from studies in liberty for prison health care. The clinical and ethical issues of insomnia in prison are described, followed by a summary of the existing studies on insomnia in prison. The results of the reported studies show t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The only previous review in this area looked at the evidence of "secondary insomnia" in a prison setting with particular reference to situational factors and then assessed the impact of insomnia upon professional management and outcomes. However, Elger's publication [33] lacked clear evidence of the search strategy, search outcome and any study quality evaluation required to give the reader confidence that the review findings were reliable. In contrast, our integrative review provides a full breakdown of the search criteria with both inclusion and exclusion criteria, databases used and the processing of publications at all stages of the selection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The only previous review in this area looked at the evidence of "secondary insomnia" in a prison setting with particular reference to situational factors and then assessed the impact of insomnia upon professional management and outcomes. However, Elger's publication [33] lacked clear evidence of the search strategy, search outcome and any study quality evaluation required to give the reader confidence that the review findings were reliable. In contrast, our integrative review provides a full breakdown of the search criteria with both inclusion and exclusion criteria, databases used and the processing of publications at all stages of the selection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our integrative review provides a full breakdown of the search criteria with both inclusion and exclusion criteria, databases used and the processing of publications at all stages of the selection process. Moreover, whilst Elger [33] made reference to some limitations in the evidence, it was not clear what methodological standards were used to assess quality and whether they were used consistently throughout the paper. The current paper showed transparency in its evaluation of each study reviewed and an appropriate critical appraisal checklist was used to assess quality [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the women also raised the problem of sleeplessness in prison. The published literature on sleep disorders and prisoners is limited, but the existing research indicates that it is an important issue (33)(34)(35)(36). Sleeplessness in prison is common for a variety of reasons.…”
Section: Health Problems In Prisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor sleep quality may also result in reduced cognitive functioning, thus limiting women's ability to effectively participate in educational and other prison-based programming beneficial to successful re-entry post release. While data suggest that sleep may be impaired for incarcerated individuals (Elger 2003, 2004, 2007, 2009; Elger & Sekera, 2009), few studies have focused on women's sleep during imprisonment. The aims of this cross-sectional descriptive exploratory investigation were to (a) describe incarcerated women's sleep quality; (b) document the risk for sleep apnea in incarcerated women; and (c) identify specific factors that contribute to poor sleep quality during incarceration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%