2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights to host discrimination and host acceptance behaviour in a parasitoid (Diptera: Asilidae): Implications for fitness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larvae are able to actively locate their hosts using chemical information provided by the hosts (Castelo & Lazzari 2004). The first instar larva of asilids, the so-called planidium (Musso 1981) can move and actively search for their hosts (Crespo & Castelo 2009). Similar location behaviour has also been reported for other dipteran larvae that are parasitic on different beetles (Godfray 1994, Brodeur & Boivin 2004.…”
Section: Lifestyle Of Asilidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larvae are able to actively locate their hosts using chemical information provided by the hosts (Castelo & Lazzari 2004). The first instar larva of asilids, the so-called planidium (Musso 1981) can move and actively search for their hosts (Crespo & Castelo 2009). Similar location behaviour has also been reported for other dipteran larvae that are parasitic on different beetles (Godfray 1994, Brodeur & Boivin 2004.…”
Section: Lifestyle Of Asilidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of M. ruficauda, it has been seen that the order of parasitism events do not determine which larva wins competition (Barrantes, 2009). However, when larvae are raised in an environment with a large amount of competitors, orientation and acceptance of poor-quality hosts increase (Crespo & Castelo, 2009;Crespo et al, 2015). Mallophora ruficauda can discriminate its host regarding its parasitism status and indeed they can recognise but are not attracted to parasitised hosts when raised individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mallophora ruficauda can discriminate its host regarding its parasitism status and indeed they can recognise but are not attracted to parasitised hosts when raised individually. However, when larvae are raised in an environment with a large amount of competitors, orientation and acceptance of poor-quality hosts increase (Crespo & Castelo, 2009;Crespo et al, 2015). Despite the fact that M. ruficauda is a solitary parasitoid and shows high levels of host specificity, data from the field show that superparasitism is common, representing almost 50% of the parasitised hosts (Castelo, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the identity of hosts, it is well known that volatile and cuticular chemicals are involved [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Regarding the parasitism status, many examples show that parasitoids are capable of host discrimination [ 3 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Host discrimination has been defined as the ability of female parasitoids to distinguish parasitized from unparasitized hosts [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parasitoid has a solitary lifestyle meaning that although more than one parasitoid may attach to the host (superparasitism), only one can survive and reach the adult stage. Although it has been found that M. ruficauda larvae are capable of host discrimination regarding its parasitism status, superparasitism is common in the field [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%