2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights on limits of detection, precision and accuracy in TXRF analysis of trace and major elements in environmental solid suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two different types of sample preparation methodologies (e.g., suspension of powdered materials and touchstone technique) were employed for the direct solid analysis of the MOX fuel pellets. 2,17 We have developed a methodology that allows for the use of the universal calibration/ relative sensitivity for elemental quantication of various samples, without the need for matrix-matched standards. Moreover, this methodology allows us to avoid the cumbersome dissolution steps, along with avoiding handling of corrosive chemicals like HF or HNO 3 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different types of sample preparation methodologies (e.g., suspension of powdered materials and touchstone technique) were employed for the direct solid analysis of the MOX fuel pellets. 2,17 We have developed a methodology that allows for the use of the universal calibration/ relative sensitivity for elemental quantication of various samples, without the need for matrix-matched standards. Moreover, this methodology allows us to avoid the cumbersome dissolution steps, along with avoiding handling of corrosive chemicals like HF or HNO 3 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasibility of such approach has recently been confirmed by Espinoza-Quiñones et al [38] who investigated several matrix reference materials applying solid suspensions prepared by using pure water. Agreeable precision and accuracy, as well as sufficient limits of detection for trace and major elements, were obtained by TXRF analysis, whereas Marguí et al [21] found minor recoveries in comparison with ICP-OES analysis of digests when suspending dried and grinded human placenta in surfactant-containing water for TXRF analysis.…”
Section: Optimization Of Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…frequently appearing validation parameters for quantitative elemental analyses are the accuracy and precision of the measurement as well as the detection limit of the determined elements [10][11][12][13] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%