2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5cy01784j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the synergistic role of metal–lattice oxygen site pairs in four-centered C–H bond activation of methane: the case of CuO

Abstract: Of the three mechanisms for activation of methane on copper and copper oxide surfaces, the under-coordinated Cu–O site pair mediated mechanism on CuO surfaces has the lowest activation energy barriers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
96
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
7
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, work done by Huang et al 88 to determine the influence of U-value on CO adsorption on Cerium oxide showed that the inclusion of the adsorbate-surface interaction and adsorption configurations in the DFT+U calculations lead to a better and relevant estimate of U-value in catalysis applications involving strongly correlated systems. (ii) DFT computed energy values were compared to the thermodynamic enthalpy data taken from standard thermodynamic tables which are non-surface specific and ignore the role and influence of active surfaces in the reaction chemistry (e.g., lattice oxygen binding strength on different facets of CuO will affect reaction enthalpy when lattice oxygen is consumed in the reaction via the Mars van Kreevelan mechanism [93][94] ). (iii) When a catalytic surface is formed, the breaking of z symmetry of the bulk phase leads to surface strains, defects, and a different atomic coordination from the bulk.…”
Section: Determining the U-value For Tmosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, work done by Huang et al 88 to determine the influence of U-value on CO adsorption on Cerium oxide showed that the inclusion of the adsorbate-surface interaction and adsorption configurations in the DFT+U calculations lead to a better and relevant estimate of U-value in catalysis applications involving strongly correlated systems. (ii) DFT computed energy values were compared to the thermodynamic enthalpy data taken from standard thermodynamic tables which are non-surface specific and ignore the role and influence of active surfaces in the reaction chemistry (e.g., lattice oxygen binding strength on different facets of CuO will affect reaction enthalpy when lattice oxygen is consumed in the reaction via the Mars van Kreevelan mechanism [93][94] ). (iii) When a catalytic surface is formed, the breaking of z symmetry of the bulk phase leads to surface strains, defects, and a different atomic coordination from the bulk.…”
Section: Determining the U-value For Tmosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.4d). Since the under coordinated surface sites are the active sites of the CuO surface [93][94] , the H2 dissociation products on the less active surface sites (saturated Cu4 and O4 surface sites) was not evaluated.…”
Section: Experimental Adsorption Energy Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations