Insights into the petroleum geology and stratigraphy of the Dakota interval (Cretaceous) in the San Juan Basin, northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado
“…Head and Owen (2005) concluded that trapping in the Basin Dakota reservoir is largely stratigraphic, but that the reservoir boundary on the west side of the accumulation is marked by a downdip gas to updip water transition in an otherwise continuous reservoir; gas limits to the south and east are controlled by stratigraphic pinchouts of the reservoir sandstones in Dakota-equivalent shales. Head and Owen (2005) also presented data that indicate there are three main compartments in the Basin Dakota reservoir that are not in pressure communication with each other and that the boundaries of these pressure compartments are controlled by depositional facies within the Dakota. Fassett and Boyce (2005) similarly concluded that the Basin Dakota trap is formed primarily by lenticular Dakota sandstones encased in marine shales with additional compartmentalization and barriers to fluid flow provided by north-south trending fractures.…”
Figure 2. Structure contour map of New Mexico on top of Precambrian basement. Contours refer to feet above or below (-) sea level. Simplified from Broadhead (Broadhead et al., 2009).
“…Head and Owen (2005) concluded that trapping in the Basin Dakota reservoir is largely stratigraphic, but that the reservoir boundary on the west side of the accumulation is marked by a downdip gas to updip water transition in an otherwise continuous reservoir; gas limits to the south and east are controlled by stratigraphic pinchouts of the reservoir sandstones in Dakota-equivalent shales. Head and Owen (2005) also presented data that indicate there are three main compartments in the Basin Dakota reservoir that are not in pressure communication with each other and that the boundaries of these pressure compartments are controlled by depositional facies within the Dakota. Fassett and Boyce (2005) similarly concluded that the Basin Dakota trap is formed primarily by lenticular Dakota sandstones encased in marine shales with additional compartmentalization and barriers to fluid flow provided by north-south trending fractures.…”
Figure 2. Structure contour map of New Mexico on top of Precambrian basement. Contours refer to feet above or below (-) sea level. Simplified from Broadhead (Broadhead et al., 2009).
“…Formation) and a lateral change from downdip gas-saturated sandstone to updip water-saturated sandstone with gas retained in the downdip sandstones, because of lower permeability associated with smaller pore sizes. Head and Owen (2005) concluded that trapping in the Basin Dakota reservoir is largely stratigraphic, but that the reservoir boundary on the west side of the accumulation is marked by a downdip gas to updip water transition in an otherwise continuous reservoir; gas limits to the south and east are controlled by stratigraphic pinchouts of the reservoir sandstones in Dakota-equivalent shales. Head and Owen (2005) also presented data that indicate there are three main compartments in the Basin Dakota reservoir that are not in pressure communication with each other and that the boundaries of these pressure compartments are controlled by depositional facies within the Dakota.…”
Figure 2. Structure contour map of New Mexico on top of Precambrian basement. Contours refer to feet above or below (-) sea level. Simplified from Broadhead (Broadhead et al., 2009).
“…Formation) and a lateral change from downdip gas-saturated sandstone to updip water-saturated sandstone with gas retained in the downdip sandstones, because of lower permeability associated with smaller pore sizes. Head and Owen (2005) concluded that trapping in the Basin Dakota reservoir is largely stratigraphic, but that the reservoir boundary on the west side of the accumulation is marked by a downdip gas to updip water transition in an otherwise continuous reservoir; gas limits to the south and east are controlled by stratigraphic pinchouts of the reservoir sandstones in Dakota-equivalent shales. Head and Owen (2005) also presented data that indicate there are three main compartments in the Basin Dakota reservoir that are not in pressure communication with each other and that the boundaries of these pressure compartments are controlled by depositional facies within the Dakota.…”
Section: Dakota Sandstonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head and Owen (2005) concluded that trapping in the Basin Dakota reservoir is largely stratigraphic, but that the reservoir boundary on the west side of the accumulation is marked by a downdip gas to updip water transition in an otherwise continuous reservoir; gas limits to the south and east are controlled by stratigraphic pinchouts of the reservoir sandstones in Dakota-equivalent shales. Head and Owen (2005) also presented data that indicate there are three main compartments in the Basin Dakota reservoir that are not in pressure communication with each other and that the boundaries of these pressure compartments are controlled by depositional facies within the Dakota. Fassett and Boyce (2005) similarly concluded that the Basin Dakota trap is formed primarily by lenticular Dakota sandstones encased in marine shales with additional compartmentalization and barriers to fluid flow provided by north-south trending fractures.…”
Figure 2. Structure contour map of New Mexico on top of Precambrian basement. Contours refer to feet above or below (-) sea level. Simplified from Broadhead (Broadhead et al., 2009).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.