2009
DOI: 10.1080/02786820903188701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the Origin of Water Soluble Organic Carbon in Atmospheric Fine Particulate Matter

Abstract: Concentrations of fine carbonaceous aerosols (PMThe authors wish to acknowledge the extraordinary co-operation of Dan Ling and his staff at the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and the assistance of the Dearborn Public Schools. We also acknowledge the assistance of the Cleveland Department of Public Health's Division of Air Quality, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, and the Hamilton County Department of Environmental Services. We would also like to acknowledge and thank Martin Shafer, Brian… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method assumes that: (1) the contribution of semi-volatile organic compounds is relatively small compared with non-volatile organics; (2) the composition of primary carbonaceous aerosol emissions and the relative contribution of each source to the aerosol load are spatially and temporally constant; and (3) the contribution of non-combustion primary particulate OC is small or constant. Further discussion of the assumptions relative to the use of this method may be found in Castro et al (1999) and Snyder et al (2009). Results of the minimum OC/EC ratio calculations indicate that the estimated annual arithmetic mean PM 1 SOC concentration was 5.5 µg m -3 , which is 28.9% of the total OC (Table 2).…”
Section: Carbonaceous Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method assumes that: (1) the contribution of semi-volatile organic compounds is relatively small compared with non-volatile organics; (2) the composition of primary carbonaceous aerosol emissions and the relative contribution of each source to the aerosol load are spatially and temporally constant; and (3) the contribution of non-combustion primary particulate OC is small or constant. Further discussion of the assumptions relative to the use of this method may be found in Castro et al (1999) and Snyder et al (2009). Results of the minimum OC/EC ratio calculations indicate that the estimated annual arithmetic mean PM 1 SOC concentration was 5.5 µg m -3 , which is 28.9% of the total OC (Table 2).…”
Section: Carbonaceous Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosols and organic vapors act as cloud condensing nuclei, stimulating cloud production (Figure 1.1; Kerminen et al, 2000;Riipinen et al, 2011). Aerosol particles come from various sources such as aeolian transport of dust, terrestrial plants (e.g., isoprene emission), combustion of plant biomass and fossil fuels (i.e., "black carbon"), and agricultural/ industrial activities (Simoneit and Elias, 2000;Pio et al, 2001;Snyder et al, 2009).…”
Section: Above-ground Carbon Flow Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WSOC is emitted by primary sources (biomass burning), is produced in the atmosphere by gas-to-particle conversion processes (secondary organic aerosol formation), and can be used to track aging of particulate carbon (Hecobian et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2012;Kirillova et al, 2013). Several campaigns have measured WSOC concentrations in the central United States; however, these campaigns do not include absorption parameters for WSOC (Anderson et al, 2008;Snyder et al, 2009;Asa-Awuku et al, 2011). This study is the first in the central United States to include long-term WSOC absorption measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%