2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the Mutational Burden of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from an Integrative Multi-Omics Approach

Abstract: To understand the mutational burden of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), we sequenced genomes of 18 fibroblast-derived iPSC lines and identified different classes of somatic mutations based on structure, origin, and frequency. Copy-number alterations affected 295 kb in each sample and strongly impacted gene expression. UV-damage mutations were present in ∼45% of the iPSCs and accounted for most of the observed heterogeneity in mutation rates across lines. Subclonal mutations (not present in all iPS… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
89
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(126 reference statements)
8
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is faster than the overall procedure from somatic cells' reprograming to pluripotent state, that requires subsequent maturation to sensory neural differentiation of $21-30 days reprograming and another $14-28 days to achieve sensory neural differentiation based on the published protocols [37,38,63,[66][67][68]. This timeline for iPSC does not include the time for required for iPSC isolation, expansion, and to evaluate the genomic integrity of iPSC [69] or clone to clone variations [70,71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is faster than the overall procedure from somatic cells' reprograming to pluripotent state, that requires subsequent maturation to sensory neural differentiation of $21-30 days reprograming and another $14-28 days to achieve sensory neural differentiation based on the published protocols [37,38,63,[66][67][68]. This timeline for iPSC does not include the time for required for iPSC isolation, expansion, and to evaluate the genomic integrity of iPSC [69] or clone to clone variations [70,71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Figure 1A, Table S1, Table S2). The samples were obtained by combining data from two large induced pluripoitent stem cell (iPSC) resources: 1) iPSCORE (273 individuals, mean WGS coverage 50X, range 36-126X) (D'Antonio et al, 2018;DeBoever et al, 2017;Panopoulos et al, 2017b) and 2) HipSci (446 samples from 204 individuals, mean WGS coverage 37X, range 35-78X) (Kilpinen et al, 2017b;Streeter et al, 2017) (Figure 1B, C). The 477 individuals include members of all five 1KGP superpopulations (Auton et al, 2015): 415 European, 34 East Asian, 15 Admixed American, 7 South Asian, and 6 African.…”
Section: The I2qtl Sample Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replication rates were calculated for each 8 SV separately among MZ twin pairs and fibroblast-iPSC pairs. The 25 MZ twin pairs were used to select filters because they have matched cell types and fewer somatic differences (D'Antonio et al, 2018) while the 152 matched fibroblasts-iPSC pairs were used to confirm the performance of these thresholds in the HipSci collection.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Sv Calling Is Associated With Quality Metmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HipSci, Supplementary File 2). For the 215 iPSCORE individuals, fibroblasts were reprogrammed, an iPSC clone obtained and RNA-seq data generated and processed as previously described (D'Antonio-Chronowska et al, 2019;D'Antonio et al, 2018;DeBoever et al, 2017;Panopoulos et al, 2017). Briefly, sequenced RNA-seq reads were aligned to the Gencode V.19 transcriptome using STAR (2.5.0a) (Dobin et al, 2013;Harrow et al, 2012).…”
Section: Human Ipscs Used In Expression Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%