2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the microalgae cultivation technology and harvesting process for biofuel production: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
77
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on high efficiency and large-scale microalgal cultivation, tubular photobioreactors (PBRs) are considered one of the most suitable culture systems. However, their weak mass transfer, wall growth, photoinhibition, and photolimitations have limited their development [7]. Several tube-based photobioreactors (PBRs) have been designed for microalgal cultivation, but the experimental characterization of the flow field in PBR is difficult and costly [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on high efficiency and large-scale microalgal cultivation, tubular photobioreactors (PBRs) are considered one of the most suitable culture systems. However, their weak mass transfer, wall growth, photoinhibition, and photolimitations have limited their development [7]. Several tube-based photobioreactors (PBRs) have been designed for microalgal cultivation, but the experimental characterization of the flow field in PBR is difficult and costly [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, all of the main steps in the algae process (cultivation, extraction, transportation and combustion) have been identified as potential energy bottlenecks of algae biofuels. [7][8][9] The present literature review focuses on work that presents data applicable to the modelling of HTL of microalgae and macroalgae feedstocks. The reader is referred to a previous paper 4 for further information about the biodiesel process used as reference process in the present assessment.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy and environmental impacts of nutrient must be decreased, making use of, for example, waste streams or areas with risk for eutrophication. Also, all of the main steps in the algae process (cultivation, extraction, transportation and combustion) have been identified as potential energy bottlenecks of algae biofuels 7‐9 …”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commercialisation of biofuels, which are promising and sustainable substitutes for fossilbased fuels, has been severely restricted to current feedstock technologies which largely rely upon the use of traditional food-based or lignocellulosic biomass [1][2][3][4]. The on-going search for sustainable and renewable feedstock alternatives has led to the recognition of microalgae as a promising long-term feedstock (known as third-generation) capable of meeting global biofuel demands [1,3,[5][6][7]. The potential of microalgae is highlighted by the typical fast growth rate of many strains, leading to high biomass production, and the ability to accumulate carbohydrate (mainly in the form of starch) and lipids, precursor molecules for sugar-based and oil-based biofuels [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain was grown mixotrophically in Tris-Acetate-Phosphate (TAP) medium[29]: 2.42 g of tris-base, 25 mL of TAP salts (15 g L -1NH4Cl, 4 g L -1 MgSO4.7H2O, 2 g L -1 CaCl2.2H2O), 0.387 mL of phosphate buffer 2.7 M (288 g L -1 K2HPO4, 144 g L -1 KH2PO4), 1 mL of trace components[50], and 1 mL of acetic acid, brought to 1 L with deionised water. For nutrient-dependent experiments a microalgal inoculum was propagated in 150 mL of TAP medium until the late stationary phase (5-7 days), reaching a cell dry weight of 0.001 g mL -1 (5.47x106 cells mL -1 ). The inoculum was placed in an orbital shaker at 150 rpm, 25 °C, and illuminated from above (125 μmol m -2 s -1 ) in a light/dark photoperiod of 16/8 h. Nutrient-dependent cultures: Mixotrophic growth dynamics co-limited by nitrogen and phosphorus were evaluated by growing microalgal cultures under different initial nitrogen (N0), phosphorus (P0), and acetic acid (A0) concentrations with respect to standard [TAP] medium (Error!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%