2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2022.123341
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the lipophilicity of four commonly prescribed antidiabetic drugs and their simultaneous analysis using a simple TLC-spectrodensitometric method: Application to fixed-dose combination tablets and human plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the time that MET, EMP and LIN spent in the micellar phase will determine their separation [ 25 ]. MET spent less time in the micellar phase due to its poor lipophilicity compared to EMP and LIN [ 26 ]. On the other hand, LIN and EMP showed nearly the same hydrophobic nature, having the same Log P values equal to 1.7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the time that MET, EMP and LIN spent in the micellar phase will determine their separation [ 25 ]. MET spent less time in the micellar phase due to its poor lipophilicity compared to EMP and LIN [ 26 ]. On the other hand, LIN and EMP showed nearly the same hydrophobic nature, having the same Log P values equal to 1.7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches were published in the literature for the simultaneous measurement of CAN and MET utilizing spectrophotometric [13][14][15] and high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) [16][17][18][19][20][21] methods. While, EMP and MET were investigated using spectrophotometric [22][23][24][25][26][27] and chromatographic [20,21,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] methods in pure and pharmaceutical form. Few published researches have discussed the simultaneous determination of the studied drugs with MEL [36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%