2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-017-1047-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the Geobacillus stearothermophilus species based on phylogenomic principles

Abstract: BackgroundThe genus Geobacillus comprises bacteria that are Gram positive, thermophilic spore-formers, which are found in a variety of environments from hot-springs, cool soils, to food manufacturing plants, including dairy manufacturing plants. Despite considerable interest in the use of Geobacillus spp. for biotechnological applications, the taxonomy of this genus is unclear, in part because of differences in DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) similarity values between studies. In addition, it is also difficult to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(90 reference statements)
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in agreement with our previous data from the 3D cartographical skin maps that revealed the presence of co-localized chloroplast and lotion molecules [18]. Other low-abundant microbial signatures found in the sunscreen lotion include additional plant-associated bacteria: mitochondria [73], Bacillaceae [74,75], Planococcaceae [76], and Ruminococcaceae family [77], but all these bacteria are not responsible for microbial changes associated to beauty product use, as they were poorly detected in the armpits and feet (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Lc-ms Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is in agreement with our previous data from the 3D cartographical skin maps that revealed the presence of co-localized chloroplast and lotion molecules [18]. Other low-abundant microbial signatures found in the sunscreen lotion include additional plant-associated bacteria: mitochondria [73], Bacillaceae [74,75], Planococcaceae [76], and Ruminococcaceae family [77], but all these bacteria are not responsible for microbial changes associated to beauty product use, as they were poorly detected in the armpits and feet (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Lc-ms Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Multiple alignment of 16S rRNA sequence of the novel G. stearothermophilus isolate (GF16) with those of other Geobacilli and Bacilli with identities from 99% to 97% was performed to build the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 2. The results confirmed the difficulty in determining a threshold for defining species within the Geobacillus genus and supported the concept that a combination of genotypic and phenotypic characteristics could be not sufficient for describing a new species [60].…”
Section: Isolation and Identification Of Geobacillus Stearothermophilsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The interest toward microorganisms of the Geobacillus genus prompted us to combine two different experimental approaches such as MALDI-TOF MS analysis and 16S rRNA sequencing to try to unambiguously identify the species. Indeed, the classification of the different species within the Geobacillus genus is challenging since the sequence similarity of the 16S rRNA can be higher than 97% even among species [60]. On the other hand, MALDI-TOF MS analysis has been proposed as a powerful bioanalytical method to detect profiles of proteins derived from whole bacterial cells to be used for bacteria identification [61].…”
Section: Isolation and Identification Of Geobacillus Stearothermophilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 16S rRNA gene sequencing is highly accurate and useful regarding bacterial classification, it may be insufficient to distinguish between some closely related species and has low discriminatory power for some genera [78]. This is the case for species within some genera, like Bacillus, Anoxibacillus, Aeribacillus, and Geobacillus [79][80][81]. Thus, the identification of bacteria, and specifically thermophiles, could benefit from the addition of other fingerprinting methods for strain and species discrimination [10,.…”
Section: G33 24g17mentioning
confidence: 99%