2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01988.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the fine architecture of the active site of chicory fructan 1‐exohydrolase: 1‐kestose as substrate vs sucrose as inhibitor

Abstract: Summary Invertases and fructan exohydrolases (FEHs) fulfil important physiological functions in plants. Sucrose is the typical substrate for invertases and bacterial levansucrases but not for plant FEHs, which are usually inhibited by sucrose. Here we report on complexes between chicory (Cichorium intybus) 1‐FEH IIa with the substrate 1‐kestose and the inhibitors sucrose, fructose and 2,5 dideoxy‐2,5‐imino‐D‐mannitol. Comparisons with other family GH32 and 68 enzyme‐substrate complexes revealed that sucrose c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
81
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the substrate is loosely bound at subsite ϩ2 or dangling into the solvent. In agreement with this observation, short substrates such as 1-kestose or raffinose are accommodated in essentially the same conformation in all the formerly described complexes (13,16,18,19). In contrast, XdINV presents a deep cavity showing multiple binding sites, a feature that has been previously described for two other fungal enzymes, the AjFT and the SoFfase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In contrast, the substrate is loosely bound at subsite ϩ2 or dangling into the solvent. In agreement with this observation, short substrates such as 1-kestose or raffinose are accommodated in essentially the same conformation in all the formerly described complexes (13,16,18,19). In contrast, XdINV presents a deep cavity showing multiple binding sites, a feature that has been previously described for two other fungal enzymes, the AjFT and the SoFfase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Although the exact position of Suc in the active site of AtcwINV1 is unknown and the structure of the AtcwINV1-Suc complex remains to be determined, the orientation of Suc in AtcwINV1 can be predicted (Fig. 6C) based on the position of Suc in the active site of B. subtilis levansucrase because the position of the terminal fructosyl at the 21 subsite is equal for all GH32 and GH68 enzymes (Verhaest et al, 2007). An Asp-239/Glu-340 functional homolog can also be found in G. diazotrophicus levansucrase (Gln-399) and T. maritima invertase (Glu-188).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that during evolution, defective cwINVs were mainly generated by mutating the Asp-239 homolog (as is the case in all FEHs; Van den Ende et al, 2009), allowing the binding of Suc as an inhibitor but not as a substrate, without interfering with fructan degradation (e.g. Suc-inhibited FEHs; Verhaest et al, 2007). Further mutations in the surrounding Trp residues probably led to gradually more inactivation or, as is the case for Nin88, a completely inactivated form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%