2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the evolution of freshwater sponges (Porifera: Demospongiae: Spongillina): Barcoding and phylogenetic data from Lake Tanganyika endemics indicate multiple invasions and unsettle existing taxonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
6
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mirrors the results of prior, individual and several gene/ITS based phylogenetic studies in freshwater sponges, e.g. (Meixner et al 2007, Erpenbeck et al 2011. As such, the monophyly of freshwater sponges, and the hypothesis of the independent evolution of endemic sponge species locally, from cosmopolitan founder species, seems secure (Meixner et al 2007).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Genomes and Mitochondrial And Nuclear-derivedsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This mirrors the results of prior, individual and several gene/ITS based phylogenetic studies in freshwater sponges, e.g. (Meixner et al 2007, Erpenbeck et al 2011. As such, the monophyly of freshwater sponges, and the hypothesis of the independent evolution of endemic sponge species locally, from cosmopolitan founder species, seems secure (Meixner et al 2007).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Genomes and Mitochondrial And Nuclear-derivedsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…mtDNA (Folmer et al 1994) bear insufficient systematicresolution for freshwater sponges (see e.g., Erpenbeck et al 2011); however, the Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS) of the nuclear rDNA cistron has repeatedly shown to provide the highest specieslevel resolution for Spongillida (e.g., Itskovich et al 2013bItskovich et al , 2015) with negligible amounts of intragenomic variability (Itskovich et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, two of the five monotypic genera of this family should be included in Spongillidae, and one should be abandoned. Furthermore, as four endemic sponge variants from lake Tanganyika also fell within the Spongillidae (Erpenbeck et al 2011), molecular analysis of the two remaining Malawispongid genera -Malawispongia (endemic Malawi) and Spinospongilla (endemic Tanganyika)could potentially lead to the family Malawispongiidae being synonymised with the family Spongillidae.…”
Section: Sequence Alignments and Tree Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%