2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1869-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into Spray Development from Metered-Dose Inhalers Through Quantitative X-ray Radiography

Abstract: Quantitative measurements in pMDI sprays allow the determination of nozzle exit conditions that are difficult to obtain experimentally by other means. Measurements of these nozzle exit conditions can improve understanding of the atomization mechanisms responsible for pMDI spray droplet and particle formation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visualization of MDI actuation and aerosol formation has been attempted by using high-speed camera, laser diffraction, Schlieren optical imaging, and phase-contrast X-ray imaging [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. With a laser and high-speed camera, Smyth et al observed asymmetrical and ellipsoid spray cross-sections in the vertical direction [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visualization of MDI actuation and aerosol formation has been attempted by using high-speed camera, laser diffraction, Schlieren optical imaging, and phase-contrast X-ray imaging [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. With a laser and high-speed camera, Smyth et al observed asymmetrical and ellipsoid spray cross-sections in the vertical direction [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a laser and high-speed camera, Smyth et al observed asymmetrical and ellipsoid spray cross-sections in the vertical direction [38]. Mason-Smith et al recorded the spray plume development in the near-nozzle region at 5 µm spatial and 0.184 ms temporal resolution, using X-ray radiography; they observed that the spray flow reached steady conditions around 30 ms after the actuation of HFA MDIs [34]. It is noted, however, that the MDI spray was discharged into a free space in most previous visualization studies, which could be different from the spray plume when released into a confined space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these measurements are also limited to observations downstream of the nozzle orifice. Imaging of transparent models (Versteeg et al, 2006) and X-ray imaging (Mason-Smith et al, 2017) reveal the morphology of the flow inside the expansion chamber, but not the drug distribution. Photon emission tomography techniques (Fleming et al, 2011) provide a useful means of characterising the fate of the drug in-vivo, but do not presently have the high spatial or temporal resolution required to observe the spray when it first exits the nozzle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique exploits the bromine atom in Ipratropium bromide (IPBr) as a molecular tracer, allowing the drug mass distribution to be measured independently of the propellant and co-solvent. Mason-Smith et al (2016) have also shown that X-ray radiography at lower photon energies can be used to measure the total line-of-sight average density of a PMDI spray with high resolution using synchrotron X-rays. To understand how drug mass fraction in the droplets varies throughout the spray, both the total spray mass and the drug mass distributions must be measured simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to diesel sprays, other spray configurations have been investigated using the APS facilities, including shear coaxial jet injectors (Lightfoot et al, 2015;Schumaker et al, 2013), liquid-centered swirl coaxial injectors (Eberhart et al, 2014), impinging jet injectors (Halls et al, 2014a), coaxial airblast atomizers (Bothell et al, 2018), jets in cross flow (Lin et al, 2016), cryogenic rocket injectors (Radke et al, 2017), metered-dose inhalers (Mason-Smith et al, 2016), and cavitating nozzles (Duke et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%