“…For the inverse situation, i.e., determining A ( E ) and g ( E ) from pyrolysis experiments, the problem is mathematically ill posed, thus unsolvable, except for simplified cases where the number of reactions is finite and the reactions are independent and do not overlap, as discussed by Scott et al One of the common approaches to overcome the ill-posed problem is to assume the type of the distribution that describes g ( E ); for instance, often, a Gaussian distribution is taken, adjusting the mean and the standard deviation of g ( E ) to fit the model to measurements. ,,− As a side note, the CPD model described earlier usually implements a Gaussian distribution as well . For DAEM and its application for determining pyrolysis kinetics, an algorithm was developed by Scott et al and demonstrated on pyrolysis of sewage sludge in a fluidized bed and later in a range of various types of unconventional, so often difficult to handle and model, fuels, such as date palm waste or microalgae . Recently, a two-dimensional DAEM was developed by considering the pre-exponential factor, A , as a separate variable, independent of E , and the distribution function is two-dimensional, g ( A , E ), depending both on A and E .…”