2012
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2012.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into p53 transcriptional function via genome-wide chromatin occupancy and gene expression analysis

Abstract: The tumor-suppressor p53 can induce various biological responses. Yet, it is not clear whether it is p53 in vivo promoter selectivity that triggers different transcription programs leading to different outcomes. Our analysis of genome-wide chromatin occupancy by p53 using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq revealed ‘p53 default program', that is, the pattern of major p53-bound sites that is similar upon p53 activation by nutlin3a, reactivation of p53 and induction of tumor cell apoptosis (RITA) or 5-fluo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

25
228
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
25
228
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If so, then these artifacts should not be reproducible across different experimental conditions. To test this, we turned to other publicly available data sets and collected 15 different TP53 ChIP-seq experiments performed in seven different cell lines under different TP53-stimulating conditions (Supplemental Table S7; Smeenk et al 2011;Nikulenkov et al 2012;Zeron-Medina et al 2013;Botcheva and McCorkle 2014;McDade et al 2014;Sánchez et al 2014;Desantis et al 2015;Hünten et al 2015;Sammons et al 2015). After calling peaks for each experiment, we categorized all peaks in each data set as direct or indirect using the random forest model.…”
Section: Indirect Chip-seq Peaks Have No Regulatory Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If so, then these artifacts should not be reproducible across different experimental conditions. To test this, we turned to other publicly available data sets and collected 15 different TP53 ChIP-seq experiments performed in seven different cell lines under different TP53-stimulating conditions (Supplemental Table S7; Smeenk et al 2011;Nikulenkov et al 2012;Zeron-Medina et al 2013;Botcheva and McCorkle 2014;McDade et al 2014;Sánchez et al 2014;Desantis et al 2015;Hünten et al 2015;Sammons et al 2015). After calling peaks for each experiment, we categorized all peaks in each data set as direct or indirect using the random forest model.…”
Section: Indirect Chip-seq Peaks Have No Regulatory Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of these 10 genes, an inclusion criteria to be used Data sets were obtained from three independent studies on p53 targets. Individual genes were highlighted with background colors when successfully validated by the current study (red), Wei et al 17 (purple) or Nikulenkov et al 18 (orange). (e) Overlap of well-characterized reported p53 targets validated by the current study (red), Wei et al 17 (purple) and Nikulenkov et al 18 (orange) as a cutoff point was calculated to be median FCZ0.248 (Po0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Individual genes were highlighted with background colors when successfully validated by the current study (red), Wei et al 17 (purple) or Nikulenkov et al 18 (orange). (e) Overlap of well-characterized reported p53 targets validated by the current study (red), Wei et al 17 (purple) and Nikulenkov et al 18 (orange) as a cutoff point was calculated to be median FCZ0.248 (Po0.05). To enhance the identification of direct p53 targets, we also performed genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled sequencing (ChIP-seq) on two different cell types HCT116 (p53 þ / þ ) and normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and their combined data set were used to provide more robust coverage of chromosome segments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations