2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into ligand binding to a glutathione S-transferase from mango: Structure, thermodynamics and kinetics

Abstract: We studied a mango glutathione S-transferase (GST) (Mangifera indica) bound to glutathione (GSH) and S-hexyl glutathione (GSX). This GST Tau class (MiGSTU) had a molecular mass of 25.5 kDa. MiGSTU Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants were determined for their substrates obtaining a Km, Vmax and kcat for CDNB of 0.792 mM, 80.58 mM·min−1 and 68.49 s−1 respectively and 0.693 mM, 105.32 mM·min−1 and 89.57 s−1, for reduced GSH respectively. MiGSTU had a micromolar affinity towards GSH (5.2 μM) or GSX (7.8 μM). The cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a class, the variable regions are often close to the active site and involved in the binding of the electrophilic substrate. In GSTUs, these regions include helix α9 and the segment from roughly the C-terminal end of α4 to the N-terminal end of α5 (Valenzuela-Chavira et al, 2017). In GSTFs, they include this segment and the connection β2-β3, which, in maize GSTF3, was supposed to move upon binding of the substrate in the active site (Neuefeind et al, 1997a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a class, the variable regions are often close to the active site and involved in the binding of the electrophilic substrate. In GSTUs, these regions include helix α9 and the segment from roughly the C-terminal end of α4 to the N-terminal end of α5 (Valenzuela-Chavira et al, 2017). In GSTFs, they include this segment and the connection β2-β3, which, in maize GSTF3, was supposed to move upon binding of the substrate in the active site (Neuefeind et al, 1997a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By deprotonating the thiol, activating GSH carries out nucleophilic attack on the electrophilic center of hydrophobic substrate to detoxicate aryl halides or to act as an electron donor to reduce peroxides [29]. Although the topology and polypeptide sequences involved are quite diverse, the H-site is composed predominantly of hydrophobic residues, which enable a wide range of hydrophobic substrates to identify the H-site accurately in the polar cavity [30]. Compared with the highly conserved G-site, the structural variability at the H-site is more important for the catalytic mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other polar contacts with the tripeptide include residues K42 (loop β 2 -α 2 ), I56 (loop α 2 -β 3 ), E68 and S69 (helix α 3 ) (PDB 1OYJ, OsGSTU1 numbering). Concerning the H-site, studies have pointed to residues located in the vicinity of the conserved serine, in loop β 1 -α 1 , helix α 4 , helix α 6 and helix α 9 [64][65][66][67][68]. A third site called the ligandin site was reported for Glycine max GSTU4-4 which binds one (4-nitrophenyl)methanethiol molecule in a hydrophobic region made of residues from helix α 1 , strand β 2 and helix α 8 [66].…”
Section: (B) Modelling Of Protoporphyrin/haem Binding By Tau Glutathione Transferasesmentioning
confidence: 99%