2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into innovative contract design to improve the integration of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the growing scientific support, and increasing feasibility thanks to advances in conservation science, indicator development, empirical modeling and digital platforms for policy administration, schemes that link payments with conservation outcomes, or limit overcompensation, remain rare (Bredemeier et al, 2022). With the ongoing global biodiversity crisis, it is high time to implement policies that increase the costeffectiveness of payments schemes to maximize the benefits of conservation budgets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growing scientific support, and increasing feasibility thanks to advances in conservation science, indicator development, empirical modeling and digital platforms for policy administration, schemes that link payments with conservation outcomes, or limit overcompensation, remain rare (Bredemeier et al, 2022). With the ongoing global biodiversity crisis, it is high time to implement policies that increase the costeffectiveness of payments schemes to maximize the benefits of conservation budgets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first step, we use a mix of different methods to identify potential cases combining literature review, web search, and expert consultation (cf. Bredemeier et al, 2022 ). We choose a sample of 19 cases to represent the four contract types, focusing only on Europe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also acknowledge that other options to group innovative contracts are possible (cf. Bredemeier et al, 2022 , Olivieri et al, 2021 ), but opt for these four contract types to explore how far each type calls for additional actors who then assume critical roles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods and materials used for the first step in our experimental design: To identify potential cases we employed a method mix combining literature review, web search, and expert consultation (cf. [1] ). For expert consultation, we approached team members of the Contracts2.0-project ( https://www.project-contracts20.eu/ ), under which umbrella the research related to the described dataset was conducted, to list possible case examples for result-based, collective, land tenure and value chain contracts for agri-environment and climate schemes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%