2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into halogen bond-driven enantioseparations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a mixed enantioseparation mechanism controlled by halogen‐dependent interactions as well as analyte steric fit seemed to be active on the amylose‐based CSP, with chromatographic outcomes depending on both volume and XBD ability of the analyte. Differently, on CDMPC the σ‐hole on halogens were shown to control enantioseparation exclusively . The occurrence of two different mechanisms as the polysaccharide backbone changes was supported by the following remarks: (i) ΔΔ S values determined for 1–3 on CDMPC (–5.36 ( 1 ) > –19.78 ( 2 ) > –27.47 ( 3 ) J/(mol K)) ranged following an opposite order compared to ADMPC (–5.95 ( 1 ) < –2.38 ( 2 ) < –0.55 ( 3 ) J/(mol K)); (ii) by enhancing MP polarity with mix B on CDMPC retention increased (0.51 ≤ k 1 ≤ 8.11), whereas selectivity decreased (1.00 ≤ α ≤ 1.67), keeping again the order Cl < Br < I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a mixed enantioseparation mechanism controlled by halogen‐dependent interactions as well as analyte steric fit seemed to be active on the amylose‐based CSP, with chromatographic outcomes depending on both volume and XBD ability of the analyte. Differently, on CDMPC the σ‐hole on halogens were shown to control enantioseparation exclusively . The occurrence of two different mechanisms as the polysaccharide backbone changes was supported by the following remarks: (i) ΔΔ S values determined for 1–3 on CDMPC (–5.36 ( 1 ) > –19.78 ( 2 ) > –27.47 ( 3 ) J/(mol K)) ranged following an opposite order compared to ADMPC (–5.95 ( 1 ) < –2.38 ( 2 ) < –0.55 ( 3 ) J/(mol K)); (ii) by enhancing MP polarity with mix B on CDMPC retention increased (0.51 ≤ k 1 ≤ 8.11), whereas selectivity decreased (1.00 ≤ α ≤ 1.67), keeping again the order Cl < Br < I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, MeOH is able to destabilize XBs by penetrating inside the chiral cavity and forming HBs with the carbonyl oxygens better than IPA due to its stereoelectronic properties (SI). Meanwhile, MeOH favors hydrophobic contacts .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the huge number of papers published in these fields, the understanding of the stereoselective interaction process is still an open issue. Indeed, multiple noncovalent interactions along with other effects can promote retention and enantioseparation : i) strong long‐range interactions involved in the primary non‐stereoselective binding, ii) non‐stereoselective adsorption of analytes to the solid support, iii) short‐range directional noncovalent interactions , underlying the stereoselective binding, which are governed by complementarity of functional groups, like hydrogen bond (HB), π‐π interactions, dipole‐dipole stacking and the emergent halogen bond (XB) , iv) steric factors deriving from the spatial arrangement of selector binding site, v) conformational changes of selector induced by selectand binding, vi) hydrophobic effects, and vii) solvation effects. This high level of complexity concerns in particular high‐molecular weight selectors such as polysaccharide derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%