2022
DOI: 10.3390/w14091380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into Flood Wave Propagation in Natural Streams as Captured with Acoustic Profilers at an Index-Velocity Gaging Station

Abstract: Recent advances in instruments are transforming our capabilities to better understand, monitor, and model river systems. The present paper illustrates such capabilities by providing new insights into unsteady flows captured with a Horizontal Acoustic Current Profiler (HADCP) integrated at an operational index-velocity gaging station. The illustrations demonstrate that the high-resolution stage and velocity measurements directly acquired during flood wave propagation reveal the intricate interplay among flow va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Channel cross-sections that include bathymetric profiles are needed for every gauged site and would greatly further the understanding of river dynamics and the improvement of rating curves. Moreover, the important phenomenon of stage-discharge hysteresis, of which convincing examples are abundant (e.g., [19,33,45]), is not accommodated by USGS rating curves and by ratings based on HEC-RAS.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel cross-sections that include bathymetric profiles are needed for every gauged site and would greatly further the understanding of river dynamics and the improvement of rating curves. Moreover, the important phenomenon of stage-discharge hysteresis, of which convincing examples are abundant (e.g., [19,33,45]), is not accommodated by USGS rating curves and by ratings based on HEC-RAS.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essential features of hysteresis behavior during flood wave propagation Temporal variation of hydraulic variables (Fig. 2a The information assembled in Figures 2a-2d and Table 1 expose several important practical considerations, with most of them related to the limited capability of the widely-used steady rating (Q0) to document hysteresis (Henderson, 1966;Fenton, 2001;Rátky, 2000;Muste et al, 2022aMuste et al, , 2022b): a) the peaks of the main hydraulic variables are not simultaneous, rather they are systematically occurring in the following order: Smax, Vmax, Qmax, and Hmax. b) the H-Q relationship appears as a loop rather than a one-to-one relationship described by the rating developed with steady-state assumption; c) the actual flow discharge (Q) is not symmetrically positioned with respect to the uniform and steady rating (Q0).…”
Section: Characterization Of Hysteretic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional IVRC and CSA monitoring approaches were revitalized by the assimilation of contemporary instruments, mostly based on acoustic principles. Details on the capabilities of exiting monitoring methods document hysteresis flows are discussed in Muste et al (2020) and Muste et al (2022a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The station, located on the Illinois River, is 200-m wide on a 0.0002 bed slope reach. A dataset of 6 years recorded at this station was analyzed to characterize the hysteretic behavior across storm events (Muste et al, 2022b). The year 2015 was selected for the present analysis to facilitate the simultaneous analysis of multiple smoothing procedures and as it contains the largest storm in the 6-year records.…”
Section: Hilbert-huang Transform (Hht)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of special importance for the present context is to capture the multivariate dependencies of the hydrographs around their peaks. These relationships, rarely investigated with prior in-situ measurements, are increasingly scrutinized (Muste et al, 2020(Muste et al, , 2022b. Difficulties arise as the useful signals are contaminated by environmental factors present at the site (e.g., debris, waviness at the free surface, probe obstructions - Baydaroğlu et al, 2018) as well from sensor-induced errors (e.g., probe accuracy, hardwired data processing, time drift, loss of calibration - Smith et al, 2010), It appears that the authors' efforts to increase the level of confidence in the hydrometric data acquired in-situ with modern instrumentation are not isolated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%