2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into Expected Changes in Regulated Flood Frequencies due to the Spatial Configuration of Flood Retention Ponds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We neglect the effect of the dam on the observed peak discharge at this gauging site and at those sites located further downstream by citing Smith et al [2010], who reported that reservoirs have a limited effect on the observed flood frequency for locations far downstream. [Ayalew et al, 2015] also showed that the effect of reservoirs on peak discharge is drastically reduced in the downstream direction. The USGS also used this streamflow gauging site and those located downstream while establishing the regional floodfrequency equations for Iowa [Eash, 2001].…”
Section: Study Area and Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 92%
“…We neglect the effect of the dam on the observed peak discharge at this gauging site and at those sites located further downstream by citing Smith et al [2010], who reported that reservoirs have a limited effect on the observed flood frequency for locations far downstream. [Ayalew et al, 2015] also showed that the effect of reservoirs on peak discharge is drastically reduced in the downstream direction. The USGS also used this streamflow gauging site and those located downstream while establishing the regional floodfrequency equations for Iowa [Eash, 2001].…”
Section: Study Area and Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because of the storage capacity of reservoirs, the postimpoundment flow regime is usually characterized by a reduction in the magnitude of maximum discharges and therefore of flood peak quantiles (Batalla et al, ; Graf, ; Magilligan & Nislow, , ; Williams & Wolman, ). The amount of the downstream peak flow reduction is strongly dependent on the position of the reservoir in the catchment, its storage capacity, the operation rule, and the spatial configuration of multiple reservoirs (Ayalew et al, , , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hess and Inman () studied the effects of urban flood‐detention reservoirs on peak discharges and flood frequencies using an event‐based rainfall‐runoff model. More recent continuous simulation studies, for both real and hypothetical catchments, analyze the effects on discharge quantiles or peak discharge of spatially distributed small reservoirs and their spatial configuration (Ayalew et al, , ; Montaldo et al, ) and the effects of reservoir capacity, operation rules, and the design of the release structures (Ayalew et al, ; Nehrke & Roesner, ). Their outcomes suggest that generally small distributed reservoirs significantly reduce flood magnitude, but their mitigation benefits are mainly local and diminish with the increase of the fraction of unregulated catchment area, contributing to peak discharge at the outlet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details about the HLM equations, configuration, and numerical solver are provided in [33] and [32]. Examples of HLM applications are provided in [32,33,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Distributed Hydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%