2015
DOI: 10.1021/cm504265w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution of g-C3N4and Highly Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite: The Role of Oxygen

Abstract: The reduced graphene oxide (RGO)-based composites have attracted intensive attention in experiment due to its superior performance as photocatalysts, but still lacking is the theoretical understanding on the interactions between constituents, and the connection between such interaction and the enhanced photoactivity. Herein, the interaction between the g-C 3 N 4 and RGO sheets is systematically explored by using state-of-the-art hybrid density functional theory. We demonstrate that the O atom plays a crucial r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
114
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
11
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the valence band offset (VBO) between the GaN and WS2 (WSe2) is about 0.2 eV (0.1 eV for GaN/WSe2), whereas the conduction band offset (CBO) between them is about 1.1 eV (1.2 eV for GaN/WSe2). Based on the analysis and the DOSs presented above, the band edge potentials of the nanocomposites versus the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) are depicted in Figs 3a and b [33,55,56]. The VBM energies of these two heterostructures are more positive than the oxidation potential (1.23 eV) of H2O/O2 for water splitting, and their CBM energies are more negative than the reduction potential for the reduction of H + to produce H2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the valence band offset (VBO) between the GaN and WS2 (WSe2) is about 0.2 eV (0.1 eV for GaN/WSe2), whereas the conduction band offset (CBO) between them is about 1.1 eV (1.2 eV for GaN/WSe2). Based on the analysis and the DOSs presented above, the band edge potentials of the nanocomposites versus the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) are depicted in Figs 3a and b [33,55,56]. The VBM energies of these two heterostructures are more positive than the oxidation potential (1.23 eV) of H2O/O2 for water splitting, and their CBM energies are more negative than the reduction potential for the reduction of H + to produce H2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other g-C 3 N 4 nanocomposites were investigated with a range of materials and morphologies [39,82,91,, to access different charge transfer mechanisms between g-C 3 N 4 and the other components. These include a g-C 3 N 4 -based type II heterojunction [103], g-C 3 N 4 -based p-n heterojunction [91,129], g-C 3 N 4 -based Z-scheme heterojunction [113,130], g-C 3 N 4 /metal heterojunction [100,102], and a g-C 3 N 4 /carbon heterojunction [131]. The design of g-C 3 N 4 heterojunction photocatalysts is an attractive strategy to tune the electronic structure and redox potentials for visible-light absorption photocatalytic H 2 generation.…”
Section: H 2 Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is discernable that the 2D graphene has directed a worldwide trend in the materials research stemming from its large surface area, remarkable electronic, optical and mechanical features, and high chemical stability (Putri et al, 2015(Putri et al, , 2016bVoon et al, 2016;Xiang et al, 2016). Up to now, a plethora of literature reports has been devoted to fabricate 2D/2D graphene/ g-C3N4 nanohybrids for photoredox catalysis in H2 evolution, pollutant degradation, and CO2 reduction (Xiang et al, 2011;Li et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2015;Wan et al, 2016). In a work by Ong et al (2015a), sandwich-like graphene/g-C3N4 nanocomposites were prepared via a one-step impregnation-thermal reduction process by employing graphene oxide and urea as the precursors ( Figure 5A).…”
Section: Hybridization With 2d Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%