2020
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1711056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into current clinical research on the immunogenicity of live attenuated influenza vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we explored the possibility of licensed live attenuated influenza vaccine backbone as a viral vector to deliver additional conserved M2e epitopes of influenza A viruses to the target cells to enhance the breadth of protection afforded by classical LAIV viruses. It is well known that LAIVs induce cross-reactive immunity with a potential to protect against drifted influenza viruses in a variety of animal models as well as in human trials [15,[42][43][44], and numerous studies have proven that LAIV is a promising viral vector for designing vaccines against other infectious pathogens [45][46][47][48]. Our recent study demonstrated that seasonal H1N1 and H3N2 LAIVs expressing four M2e tandem repeats within the chimeric HAs can elicit M2e-specific antibody and, to a lesser extent, T-cell responses which enhanced cross-protective potential of the vaccines [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we explored the possibility of licensed live attenuated influenza vaccine backbone as a viral vector to deliver additional conserved M2e epitopes of influenza A viruses to the target cells to enhance the breadth of protection afforded by classical LAIV viruses. It is well known that LAIVs induce cross-reactive immunity with a potential to protect against drifted influenza viruses in a variety of animal models as well as in human trials [15,[42][43][44], and numerous studies have proven that LAIV is a promising viral vector for designing vaccines against other infectious pathogens [45][46][47][48]. Our recent study demonstrated that seasonal H1N1 and H3N2 LAIVs expressing four M2e tandem repeats within the chimeric HAs can elicit M2e-specific antibody and, to a lesser extent, T-cell responses which enhanced cross-protective potential of the vaccines [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data suggest that the site of administration of T-cell-based RSV vaccines is crucial. For example, these epitopes can be delivered to the respiratory tract by live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) viruses (Isakova-Sivak et al, 2016a), which are known to be effective inducers of cross-reactive T-cell responses (Isakova-Sivak et al, 2020;Korenkov et al, 2018;Mohn et al, 2017). In addition, such bivalent LAIV-RSV vaccines could be used for simultaneous prophylaxis of the two respiratory pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the suppression of influenza A replication by influenza B NP has been found [59]. The lower variability of influenza B could provide a cross-reactivity of immunity factors and consequently a faster immunity activation after boost with a new vaccine dose; this is discussed as a possible reason for the low vaccine effectiveness of the influenza A component (reviewed in [60]). The ability to prepare strains of both subtypes on the one backbone, in theory, could be a key to solving the interference problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%