In this thematic minireview series, the JBC presents six exciting articles on low complexity or intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). The dynamical and fluctuating structures of IDPs or of disordered regions within proteins result in virtually all of their primary sequence being exposed, at least at some time, to potential interacting partners. Their structural versatility underlies their often wide functional repertoires, which is further expanded by post-translational modifications. Given these characteristics, it is not surprising that IDPs serve as important hubs in signaling networks, scaffolding multivalent interactions. They are also important for organizing membrane-less protein organelles. This collection of reviews discusses biophysical approaches for studying IDPs and illuminates their importance to critical functions such as cell cycle control, transcription, and translation, as well as their regulation via cellular input signals.
How are IDPs2 or protein regions scripted in primary sequence space? In the first article in this series, Uversky notes that the sequence space of IDPs is typified by a low content of hydrophobic amino acid residues and high content of uncompensated charges (1). Missing an innate folding code, IDPs rely on binding partners to confer structural order, which, depending on the ligand, can lead to differently folded structures. Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) represent yet another strategy for modulating IDPs. Moreover, functionally significant structural transitions can involve differently disordered forms. Hence, the potential multiplicity of form and function in IDPs defies the conventional one structure-one function notion. In fact, many hub proteins that link protein-protein interaction networks and integrate signals are IDPs exemplifying the importance of dynamic structural remodeling for supporting a range of functions. The review ends with provocative ideas about the evolution of IDPs, which are more prevalent in complex organisms and are often encoded by regions of mRNA affected by alternative splicing.The utility of kinetic approaches for illuminating the mechanism of coupled folding and binding of IDPs is the subject of the second article in the series by Clarke and co-workers (2). Charged residues are overrepresented in IDPs, which can be exacerbated by their propensity for PTMs such as phosphorylation. Hence, electrostatic steering is considered to be important for enhancing coupled folding and binding of IDPs. Kinetic studies are also important for addressing the chicken and egg question of whether binding (in which folding is induced upon binding) or folding (in which only a select conformer from the ensemble can bind) comes first. Finally, the authors discuss how the combination of mutagenesis and kinetic studies can allow the molecular interactions in the transition state between IDPs and their partners to be mapped.In the third article in the series, Bah and Forman-Kay discuss modulation of IDP function by PTMs (3). The structural and therefore func...