2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into chromatographic separation using core–shell metal–organic frameworks: Size exclusion and polarity effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3E and F). Macromolecules, such as Congo red and HA, did not affect the adsorption of iAs because of the size exclusion effect of the crystalline MIL-100(Fe) with the 1-nm pores50. Thus, the MIL-100(Fe) shell also provided the possibility of improving selectivity by its electrostatic repulsion interactions and size exclusion effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3E and F). Macromolecules, such as Congo red and HA, did not affect the adsorption of iAs because of the size exclusion effect of the crystalline MIL-100(Fe) with the 1-nm pores50. Thus, the MIL-100(Fe) shell also provided the possibility of improving selectivity by its electrostatic repulsion interactions and size exclusion effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, numerous reports have been made to describe the adsorption capacity (and characteristics) of MOFs against common VOCs like aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., benzene, toluene, and xylene)142021222324. There is yet a paucity of quantitative data on their capacity toward semi-volatile organic species such as C 2 –C 5 VFAs, phenolic, and indolic compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9C). chloroaniline isomers per HKUST-1 unit cell [34]. A possible explanation for the discrepancy may again originate from imperfections in the crystallinity of our UiO-67 MOF shells.…”
Section: Single Component Chromatography Runs With Isocratic Elutionmentioning
confidence: 87%