2022
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2022.2148273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights from Two Decades of PISA-related Studies in the New Century: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientific understanding is divided into several dimensions, based on the OECD 2000 scientific understanding is divided into three dimensions, namely the dimensions of science content, science processes, and science context (Zheng et al, 2022). Content in scientific literacy includes material…”
Section: Scientific Literacy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific understanding is divided into several dimensions, based on the OECD 2000 scientific understanding is divided into three dimensions, namely the dimensions of science content, science processes, and science context (Zheng et al, 2022). Content in scientific literacy includes material…”
Section: Scientific Literacy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step structure subscale scores (i.e., PVRTSN and PVRTML) in PISA 2018, suggesting that B-S-J-Z (China) has been able to maintain a similar level of performance in reading as seen in previous cycles of PISA (OECD, 2012;Zheng et al, 2022). The three other Asian regions (i.e., Singapore, Macao, and Hong Kong) also scored higher on both the overall reading performance and subscale scores compared with Western regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%