2018
DOI: 10.1177/0963721418807725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights From Crossing Research Silos on Visual and Auditory Attention

Abstract: Many learning tasks that children encounter necessitate the ability to direct and sustain attention to key aspects of the environment while simultaneously tuning out irrelevant features. This is challenging for at least two reasons: (a) The ability to regulate and sustain attention follows a protracted developmental time course, and (b) children spend much of their time in environments not optimized for learning—homes and schools are often chaotic, cluttered, and noisy. Research on these issues is often siloed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Habituation rate is influenced by a variety of factors, including characteristics of the stimulus. For example, complex stimuli are thought to capture attention more readily and can yield slower habituation rates compared to more simple stimuli, although age can also affect the rate of habituation (e.g., Caron & Caron, 1968; for review and discussion, see Cohen & Cashon, 2003; Godwin, Erickson, & Newman, 2019; Kavšek, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habituation rate is influenced by a variety of factors, including characteristics of the stimulus. For example, complex stimuli are thought to capture attention more readily and can yield slower habituation rates compared to more simple stimuli, although age can also affect the rate of habituation (e.g., Caron & Caron, 1968; for review and discussion, see Cohen & Cashon, 2003; Godwin, Erickson, & Newman, 2019; Kavšek, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional research is needed to determine whether electronic toys disrupt play-based language learning opportunities in other ways. The background noise introduced by electronic toys may make it more difficult for children to understand spoken language, especially when it incorporates speech or other rhythmic sounds (Baker and Holding, 1993;Kirkorian et al, 2009;McMillan and Saffran, 2016;Erickson and Newman, 2017;Godwin et al, 2018;McAuley et al, 2020McAuley et al, , 2021. In addition, the salient visual features of electronic toys, such as flashing lights, may compete with other relevant aspects of the child's visual environment (Radesky and Christakis, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most investigators agree that the ability to control attention improves with age. Reviews have focused on further questions: distinguishing the relatively late development of executive attention from earlier-developing, stimulus-driven forms of attention (Rueda, 2013); development of attention as part of a dynamic system rather than as a static gatekeeper (Ristic & Enns, 2015); similarities and differences between auditory and visual attention (Godwin et al, 2019); and the importance of both interference and redundancy between modalities (Bahrick & Lickliter, 2014). There has been recent research on the developmental trajectory of sustained attention (Betts et al, 2006) and of the ability to allocate and share attention (Irwin-Chase & Burns, 2000), as well as on the relation of practical and social functioning to working memory loads and attention (Doebel, 2020; Hilton et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%