2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights from baited video sampling of temperate reef fishes: How biased are angling surveys?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Parker et al. ), and they are typically less strongly influenced by depth, bottom relief, or fish behavior (Cappo et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Parker et al. ), and they are typically less strongly influenced by depth, bottom relief, or fish behavior (Cappo et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the use of fishery-independent survey data to characterize reef-fish populations has increased dramatically, especially that of data that are obtained through visual sampling. Visual surveys are less selective than those that use traditional capture gear such as traps (Bacheler et al 2013), trawls (Wells et al 2008), and hooks Parker et al 2016), and they are typically less strongly influenced by depth, bottom relief, or fish behavior (Cappo et al 2003). Visual-based sampling methods used to target reef fishes in the southeastern United States include stereo baited remote underwater video (S-BRUV) arrays (Saul et al 2013;Campbell et al 2015; Thompson et al 2017;Keenan et al 2018), towed cameras (Lembke et al 2017), diver visual surveys (Smith et al 2011;Harford et al 2016), and trap-mounted video cameras (Bacheler et al 2013(Bacheler et al , 2014(Bacheler et al , 2016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent investigations comparing synchronously collected optical data and either hook or trap data routinely showed that the optical surveys collected higher diversity, had improved detection (i.e., decreased false negatives), and tracked population abundance more precisely (Harvey et al. ; Parker et al. 2016a, 2016b; Streich et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Parker et al . 2016b), represents high population growth or decline scenarios that may signal changes in environmental conditions or fishing intensity. In both cases, it was assumed that the trends would be sustained over 5 years, a time period feasible for management regimes for marine species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OMP target is meant to be an estimate of population growth that allows for moderately high fishing intensity (Johnston & Butterworth 2005). Jasus lalandii is a slowgrowing crustacean with recent declines in growth rates and 10%, the mean rate used in similar power analyses of teleost species (De Vos et al 2014;Parker et al 2016b), represents high population growth or decline scenarios that may signal changes in environmental conditions or fishing intensity. In both cases, it was assumed that the trends would be sustained over 5 years, a time period feasible for management regimes for marine species.…”
Section: Power Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%