Insight into the response time of fail-safe magnetorheological damper

Abstract

The significant problem of magnetorheological (MR) dampers is their poor fail-safe ability. In the case of power supply failure, the damper remains in a low damping state which is dangerous for several technical applications. This can be solved by accommodating a permanent magnet to the magnetic circuit of the damper. Currently, the MR dampers are used in progressive semiactive (S/A) control of suspension systems. The dynamics (force response time) of the damper is an important parameter that affects the performance of semiactive control. The main goal of this paper is to introduce the dynamic behavior of MR damper with a permanent magnet. The damper design with the permanent magnet in the magnetic circuit, transient magnetic simulation including magnetic hysteresis and eddy currents, and experiments are presented. The magnetic field response time and MR damper force response time are measured and also determined from magnetic simulation. The permanent magnet significantly influences the MR damper dynamics. The decrease of the damping force from a fail-safe state -medium damping to off-state -low damping is significantly faster (2 ms, -1A) than the increase to on-state -high damping (12 ms, 1A). The exact value is depending on the electric current magnitude and piston velocity. The damper achieved fail-safe damping force approximately 1/3 of the maximum damping force. The exact value of the fail-safe force is magnetization history-dependent. The maximum dynamic force range is 8.5 which is comparable with the common design of MR damper.

Review: A Survey on Configurations and Performance of Flow-Mode MR Valves

“…The condition can be deemed unsafe. Arguably, fail-safe valves may be a remedy for this scenario [81,90,91]. In those valves, permanent magnets are used for generating the bias flux φ pm , which, in turn, raises the induced pressure drop above the minimum levels with no need to energize the electromagnet.…”

“…MR valves: configurations, 1-core, 2-coil(s), 3-primary flow path(s), 4-ring, 5-bypass, 6-(non-magnetic) spacer ring, 7-permanent magnet. (a) Benchmark valve [24,25]; (b) Variable height [69]; (c) Annulus location [77]; (d) Bypass valve[59,60,78,79]; (e) High active area ratio[80]; (f) Fail-safe valve[81]; (g) Dual annulus (concentric)[66]; (h) Dual annulus, adapted from[66,77,82].…”

The research of a multi-stage roller type magnetorheological transmission device on temperature properties

“…MR fluid is adopted as a working medium for power transmission with significant advantages, such as quick response, simple control, low energy consumption, as well as high anti-interference ability (Zhu et al, 2021). Therefore, MR fluid is widely used in aerospace (Jeniš et al, 2021), automotive (Acharya et al, 2021), hydraulic transmission (Białek et al, 2021), and other fields (Acharya et al, 2019) .…”

Hydrodynamic response time of magnetorheological fluid in valve mode: model and experimental verification

“…Furthermore, additives are added to improve sedimentation stability [4][5][6], rheological or tribological [7] properties of MR fluid. These properties allow the use of MR fluid in electro-mechanical systems such as dampers [8][9][10][11], clutches [12,13], or seals [14][15][16]. MR dampers are currently used in the automotive/railway/aviation industries and the like.…”