“…Subsequently, 75 studies were excluded for the following reasons: lacking either heathy controls or group comparison analyses, restricting samples to adolescents or older adults, not analyzing the whole brain, reporting non-significant group comparisons, and including individuals at a high-risk of mental illnesses or with subclinical diagnosis (Table S1). Finally, a total of 32 publications were included in our meta-analysis ( Figure 1), with three overlapping samples that were reported in multiple publications, one sample was used in three papers (Larabi, et al, 2018;van der Meer, et al, 2014;Zhang, et al, 2020), and two samples each used in a pair of papers (Goldin, et al, 2009a;Heller, et al, 2009;Johnstone, et al, 2007;Ziv, et al, 2013). As mentioned earlier, we rigorously avoided convergence over analyses performed on the same samples both within and across papers.…”