Inside the Fish Brain: Cognition, Learning and Consciousness

Fernö, Anders; Folkedal, Ole; Nilsson, Jonatan; Kristiansen, Tore

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41675-1_7

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 191 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interestingly, the thrashing behaviour was typically maintained throughout the exposure duration during the first treatment but was less dominating during the second treatment. This might be due to habituation; it is well known that salmon can habituate to a frightening and/or painful stimuli ( Fernö et al., 2020 ). The number of exposures is, however, normally far higher than one for salmon to exhibit significant habituation ( Bratland et al., 2010 ; Madaro et al., 2016 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Warm water treatment increased mortality risk in salmon

Bui

Madaro

Nilsson

et al. 2022

Veterinary and Animal Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Warm water treatment increased mortality risk in salmon

Bui

Madaro

Nilsson

et al. 2022

Veterinary and Animal Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Currently, research remains to be conducted to determine the nature of these central emotional states, some of which, such as fear, could be common to the entire animal kingdom (124)(125)(126). While awaiting new results in this field and an eventual broad consensus, we have chosen to study the basic or primary emotions common to humans and mammals (and birds), identified and documented in the seminal work of Jaak Panksepp, of which we propose to expose the key elements with, in particular, the description of the seven primary emotional systems, in section Description of the Seven Primary/Basic Emotional Systems.…”

Section: Emotions As a Key Process For The Study Of Haimentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrative Model of Human-Animal Interactions: A One Health–One Welfare Systemic Approach to Studying HAI

Leconstant

Spitz²

2022

Front. Vet. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Integrative Model of Human-Animal Interactions (IMHAI) described herewith provides a conceptual framework for the study of interspecies interactions and aims to model the primary emotional processes involved in human-animal interactions. This model was developed from theoretical inputs from three fundamental disciplines for understanding interspecies interactions: neuroscience, psychology and ethology, with the objective of providing a transdisciplinary approach on which field professionals and researchers can build and collaborate. Seminal works in affective neuroscience offer a common basis between humans and animals and, as such, can be applied to the study of interspecies interactions from a One Health-One Welfare perspective. On the one hand, Jaak Panksepp's research revealed that primary/basic emotions originate in the deep subcortical regions of the brain and are shared by all mammals, including humans. On the other hand, several works in the field of neuroscience show that the basic physiological state is largely determined by the perception of safety. Thus, emotional expression reflects the state of an individual's permanent adaptation to ever-changing environmental demands. Based on this evidence and over 5 years of action research using grounded theory, alternating between research and practice, the IMHAI proposes a systemic approach to the study of primary-process emotional affects during interspecies social interactions, through the processes of emotional transfer, embodied communication and interactive emotional regulation. IMHAI aims to generate new hypotheses and predictions on affective behavior and interspecies communication. Application of such a model should promote risk prevention and the establishment of positive links between humans and animals thereby contributing to their respective wellbeing.

show abstract

“…The focus had been on fish cognition in general, which was similar to investigating mammalian cognition on the assumption that moose and mice see the world similarly. Species-specific efforts are not only essential to better understanding these animals’ worlds, needs, and preferences but to gathering key evidence to support a scientific answer to a fundamental question: Are fish sentient [ 53 ]? Despite the elaborated arguments against this notion [ 54 , 55 ], the great variability across fish species and our dearth of knowledge about most of them, current behavioral and neurophysiological evidence support the hypothesis that teleosts—and perhaps all fish species—process information at the conscious level and are capable of suffering from psychological stressors in addition to physiological stressors [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ].…”

Section: An Updated Concept Of Animal Welfarementioning

confidence: 99%

From Land to Water: Taking Fish Welfare Seriously

Sánchez-Suárez

Franks

Torgerson-White

2020

Animals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to use contemporary (terrestrial) animal welfare science as a lens to evaluate the state of knowledge concerning welfare in fish species, focusing on farmed fishes. We take advantage of the vast expertise—including previous pitfalls and accomplishments—in the investigation of welfare in terrestrial vertebrates, borrowing questions and methodologies from terrestrial animal welfare science in order to (1) better understand the challenges and opportunities in the study of welfare in fish species, and (2) propose strategies for filling knowledge gaps.

show abstract

Inside the Fish Brain: Cognition, Learning and Consciousness

Cited by 8 publications

References 191 publications

Warm water treatment increased mortality risk in salmon

Warm water treatment increased mortality risk in salmon

Integrative Model of Human-Animal Interactions: A One Health–One Welfare Systemic Approach to Studying HAI

From Land to Water: Taking Fish Welfare Seriously

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About