2005
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.4.2252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insertion of the Dibasic Motif in the Flanking Region of a Cryptic Self-Determinant Leads to Activation of the Epitope-Specific T Cells

Abstract: Efficient induction of self tolerance is critical for avoiding autoimmunity. The T cells specific for the well-processed and -presented (dominant) determinants of a native self protein are generally tolerized in the thymus, whereas those potentially directed against the inefficiently processed and presented (cryptic) self epitopes escape tolerance induction. We examined whether the crypticity of certain determinants of mouse lysozyme-M (ML-M) could be attributed to the nonavailability of a proteolytic site, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the finding that DM-negative APC are active at presentation of the cryptic peptides shows that the cryptic epitopes are neither overproteolyzed nor inadequately released during endosomal processing. This finding argued against differential proteolysis of cryptic vs. immunodominant peptides-one of the common explanations for crypticity in immune responses [2,21,22,[44][45][46][47]. Secondly, all immunodominant peptides behaved similarly, and were enhanced by DM while the cryptic epitopes behaved similarly and were antagonized by DM.…”
Section: A Peptide-intrinsic View Of Immunodominance In Cd4 T Cell Rementioning
confidence: 79%
“…First, the finding that DM-negative APC are active at presentation of the cryptic peptides shows that the cryptic epitopes are neither overproteolyzed nor inadequately released during endosomal processing. This finding argued against differential proteolysis of cryptic vs. immunodominant peptides-one of the common explanations for crypticity in immune responses [2,21,22,[44][45][46][47]. Secondly, all immunodominant peptides behaved similarly, and were enhanced by DM while the cryptic epitopes behaved similarly and were antagonized by DM.…”
Section: A Peptide-intrinsic View Of Immunodominance In Cd4 T Cell Rementioning
confidence: 79%
“…2), with the difference between SLSDL and LEQLE being the most pronounced. This is yet another example of the influences that flanking sequences can impose upon the MHC class I presentation of epitopes (52)(53)(54)(55)(56). Presumably, the enzymes responsible for removing the N-terminal sequences are more active against LEQLE than the SLSDL sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proposed that self-tolerance might be infringed in autoimmunity by the activation of T cells directed against cryptic self-determinants [15], [16]: well-processed and -presented antigenic determinants are immunodominant, while poorly processed/presented ones curtail the activation of specific T cells and are thus cryptic. Then, certain conditions (e.g., addition of a cleavage site [17] or of inflammatory mediators [18]) can help circumvent self tolerance and thereby lead to autoimmunity. Viral or bacterial infections have also been suspected as triggering factors for autoimmune disorders, possibly through molecular mimicry and/or bystander activation of autoreactive cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%