Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes

Abstract

Devices such as inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) can be used to achieve erectile rigidity after phalloplasty in assigned female at birth (AFAB) individuals. The approach to inserting an IPP in a neophallus is different and more challenging compared to that of an anatomical penis due to the absence of anatomical structures such as the corpora cavernosa, and the more tenuous blood supply of the neophallus and reconstructed urethra. In addition, the ideal surgical techniques and devices for use in the neophallus have not been defined. This review systematically summarises the literature on the insertion of IPP in the neophallus of individuals AFAB. In particular, the described techniques, types of devices used and peri-operative and patient-reported outcomes are emphasised. An initial search of the PubMed database was performed on 16 September 2022 and an updated search was performed on 26 May 2023. Overall, 185 articles were screened for eligibility and 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Two studies reported outcomes on the zephyr surgical implant 475 FTM device and the others reported outcomes on the Boston Scientific AMS 600/700TM CX 3-piece inflatable, AMS AmbicorTM 2-piece inflatable, Coloplast Titan® or Dynaflex devices. Overall, 1106 IPPs were analysed. The infection rate was 4.2%–50%, with most studies reporting an infection rate of <30%. Mechanical failure or dysfunction occurred in 1.4%–36.4%, explantation was required in 3.3%–41.6%, and implant revision or replacement was performed in 6%–70%. Overall, 51.4%–90.6% of patients were satisfied and 77%–100% were engaging in sexual intercourse. An IPP in a neophallus is an acceptable option to achieve rigidity for sexual intercourse. However, this challenging procedure has good reports of patient and partner satisfaction despite significant risks of complications.

Penile Microdissection: A Live Donor Feasibility Study in Feminizing Gender-Affirming Surgery

“…Also, depending on the technique of choice, neophalloplasty can result in altered or diminished sensation in the neophallus and surrounding areas. Furthermore, these complications, poor cosmetic results, and non-satisfactory erectile function remain and present a great challenge for better options [2,3,22]. The vascularized composite allotransplantation became an option for the treatment of complex hand and face defects, making it a feasible alternative for genital reconstruction [23,24].…”